Bill Overview
Title: Free City Commission Act
Description: This bill establishes the Free City Commission to study the effects of progressive governance on cities within the United States over the last 75 years.
Sponsors: Rep. Cawthorn, Madison [R-NC-11]
Target Audience
Population: People living in cities potentially impacted by progressive governance policies
Estimated Size: 264000000
- The bill proposes a study on progressive governance within cities over the last 75 years, which suggests an examination of policies and their outcomes.
- Given the focus on 'progressive governance,' cities that have employed such policies will be directly involved in the study.
- The outcomes relevant to city welfare can affect anyone living within those cities, from infrastructure decisions to social services and housing laws.
- Even though the study is based in the United States, the focus on cities suggests impacts on urban populations specifically.
Reasoning
- The Free City Commission Act primarily affects urban populations, particularly those in cities with a history of progressive governance.
- Given the diverse impacts progressive policies can have, such as on housing, public services, and economic policies, the influence on individuals can vary greatly.
- The budget constraints imply a focused study, meaning not every individual in these cities will feel direct changes from the policy itself, but rather from the broader impact of studied policy changes over time.
- Urban populations include a range of demographics, from professionals benefiting from progressive business policies to more vulnerable groups reliant on social services impacted by such governance.
- City-based workers, local government officials, activists, and residents in areas known for progressive policy implementation are likely more immediately attuned to the study’s outcomes.
Simulated Interviews
City Planner (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I believe this study is crucial for understanding the long-term impacts of policies we've put in place.
- It might help us refine our strategies for future urban development.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Social Worker (Detroit, MI)
Age: 33 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Progressive policies have been a double-edged sword here.
- This study could push for more balanced interventions that truly benefit communities.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Startup Founder (New York, NY)
Age: 28 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Understanding how progressive policies have shaped commerce and innovation is essential.
- I hope the study highlights ways to further support business growth.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Retired Teacher (Portland, OR)
Age: 62 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm hopeful the study will emphasize the positive educational impacts progressive policies have had.
- Public education and services have sustained our city's growth.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Tech Consultant (Austin, TX)
Age: 40 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- We need evidence-based analysis for city governance to improve efficiency.
- The study can spotlight best practices that other cities might adopt.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Small Business Owner (Seattle, WA)
Age: 54 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Many small businesses struggle under some progressive policies.
- I'm curious if this study will address support for local business ecosystems.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 4 |
College Student (Boston, MA)
Age: 19 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 4.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This is an exciting time for future policymakers like myself.
- I hope the study provides case studies for our curriculum.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Public Health Official (Chicago, IL)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 7.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Urban health can benefit significantly from insights this study might reveal.
- We need to understand long-term health impacts of city policies.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Retired (Miami, FL)
Age: 75 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I've benefited from policies here, but there's always room for improvement.
- I hope the study will highlight areas needing attention in senior services.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Government Employee (Atlanta, GA)
Age: 37 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Long-terms studies like this can foster better governance practices.
- Leveraging past experiences will be key to future successes.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $20000000)
Year 2: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $20000000)
Year 3: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $20000000)
Year 5: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $20000000)
Year 10: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $20000000)
Year 100: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $20000000)
Key Considerations
- The success of the study in influencing city governance depends on how well its findings are received and implemented.
- The large number of cities with diverse contexts may complicate data collection and generalization of findings.
- Ensuring transparency and broad stakeholder engagement is crucial for the study's credibility.