Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8580

Bill Overview

Title: The LTCH Access and Stability Act

Description: This bill waives the Medicare site-neutral payment rate for inpatient services at long-term care hospitals for an additional 12 months after the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services must report on the effects of this waiver on hospital admissions and overall access to services, among other information.

Sponsors: Rep. Sewell, Terri A. [D-AL-7]

Target Audience

Population: People requiring long-term inpatient hospital care who are eligible for Medicare

Estimated Size: 200000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Retired teacher (Florida)

Age: 78 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The waiver sounds beneficial, given my recent stay at a long-term care hospital.
  • I often worry about hospital bills; knowing that Medicare might cover more, even temporarily, relieves some stress.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 4 4

Retired engineer (Texas)

Age: 85 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • My care needs have been costly; extra Medicare support would help.
  • I hope it leads to more care options at LTCHs nearby.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 5 4
Year 5 5 3
Year 10 4 3
Year 20 3 3

Retired nurse (California)

Age: 94 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Accessing full Medicare benefits is difficult; this could ease my burden.
  • I've been apprehensive about being transferred out of LTCHs due to costs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 3
Year 2 4 3
Year 3 3 2
Year 5 3 2
Year 10 2 2
Year 20 2 1

Retired lawyer (New York)

Age: 65 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Although I'm currently healthy, I plan for potential LTCH needs in the future.
  • This seems to offer peace of mind for those planning care avenues.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 4 4

Retired postal worker (Illinois)

Age: 75 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 1.5 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • LTCH availability can dramatically affect my life, offering better lifelong care.
  • This policy sounds like a temporary solace, hoping for permanent solutions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 5 3
Year 3 4 3
Year 5 4 3
Year 10 3 3
Year 20 3 2

Retired librarian (Georgia)

Age: 70 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I seldom need extended long-term hospital care.
  • The policy feels less relevant to me, though it could help others.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 6 6

Retired firefighter (Ohio)

Age: 83 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 2

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The costs here are overwhelming – extra Medicare support would make a huge difference.
  • Policies like this make me feel seen and less forgotten.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 2
Year 2 3 2
Year 3 3 2
Year 5 2 2
Year 10 2 1
Year 20 1 1

Retired artist (Massachusetts)

Age: 68 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While my conditions are stable, could benefit from better supporting coverage.
  • Crafty policies like this can sometimes push better general healthcare reforms.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 4 4
Year 20 4 4

Retired farmer (Alabama)

Age: 72 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 1.5 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Being reliant on these hospitals, policy change to help costs feels like a lifeline.
  • Spares my savings for other essential needs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 5 4
Year 5 4 4
Year 10 4 3
Year 20 3 3

Retired seamstress (Michigan)

Age: 80 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.5 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I occasionally use LTCH services, extra Medicare benefits add comfort.
  • Hope it inspires more permanent improvements in patient support.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 4 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $1200000000 (Low: $1000000000, High: $1400000000)

Year 2: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations