Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8575

Bill Overview

Title: FAIR Contributions Act

Description: This bill requires the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to study and report on the feasibility of funding the Universal Service Fund through contributions from edge providers (i.e., providers of online content or services, such as search engines). The fund provides support to high-cost areas, schools and libraries, rural health care facilities, and the Lifeline program (an FCC program that provides a discount on phone service for low-income consumers). The report must consider (1) the type and size of firms and services on which contributions could be assessed, (2) equity issues related to current versus alternative systems for contributing to the fund, (3) the effect of any change to the contribution system on the telecommunications bills of consumers, and (4) the sustainability of the fund and how to ensure that fund disbursements are consistent and predictable over time.

Sponsors: Rep. Mullin, Markwayne [R-OK-2]

Target Audience

Population: people who use telecommunications services globally

Estimated Size: 280000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Elementary School Teacher (Rural Texas)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm hopeful that the policy could bring more stable internet connections to our school, but concerned about potential costs being passed to me as a consumer.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 5 3
Year 20 4 3

Software Engineer (New York City, NY)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm concerned about potential increased costs to our business, but it might be balanced if it leads to improved service infrastructure.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Retired (Las Vegas, NV)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I rely heavily on the Lifeline program, so any changes to funding could severely impact my ability to afford telecommunications.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 5 3
Year 5 4 2
Year 10 3 2
Year 20 3 2

Freelance Graphic Designer (Portland, OR)

Age: 25 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Stable internet is crucial for my work. If this policy improves infrastructure and access, it would be beneficial.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 4

Small Business Owner (Chicago, IL)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If the policy leads to increased operational costs, that could squeeze my business margins. But if it improves overall infrastructure, the long-term benefits might offset those.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 4 3

Nursing Assistant (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm worried about potential cuts to the Lifeline program, but hopeful for any improvements that might help.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 5 4
Year 5 4 3
Year 10 4 3
Year 20 3 3

College Student (Seattle, WA)

Age: 18 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Improving internet services at educational institutions is crucial. If the policy benefits schools, that would help my studies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 4

Librarian (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Our library's services could improve or face challenges depending on funding changes. We need predictable support.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 5 4

Customer Service Representative (Houston, TX)

Age: 37 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If this policy can make rural internet more reliable, it could really help my work from home situation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 4 3

Doctor in rural clinic (Miami, FL)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Reliable internet is vital for our telehealth services. Ensuring funding for these services is crucial.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $6000000)

Year 2: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations