Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8514

Bill Overview

Title: SWIMS Act of 2022

Description: This bill establishes prohibitions on capturing, importing, exporting, or breeding of orcas, beluga whales, false killer whales, or pilot whales for the purpose of public display. Specifically, the bill prohibits the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration from issuing any permit under the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 that authorizes the taking (e.g., capturing) or importation of such orcas or whales for the purpose of public display. The bill further revises the act to make it unlawful to export such orcas or whales, unless they are being transported to marine mammal sanctuaries or for release into the wild. Further, the bill makes it unlawful under the Animal Welfare Act for any person to breed or artificially inseminate such marine mammals for purposes of using their progeny for public display.

Sponsors: Rep. Schiff, Adam B. [D-CA-28]

Target Audience

Population: People interested in the well-being of marine mammals

Estimated Size: 10000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Marine Biologist (Seattle, WA)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The SWIMS Act is a crucial step toward ensuring the ethical treatment of marine mammals.
  • I hope more sanctuaries will receive funding as a result of this policy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 9 6
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 9 5

Marine Park Manager (San Diego, CA)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The legislation poses a significant challenge to our business.
  • We may need to find innovative ways to engage our audience without these mammals.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 7
Year 5 6 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 8 7

Veterinary Student (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 27 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think it's fantastic that the SWIMS Act is prioritizing animal welfare.
  • I look forward to contributing to rescue and rehabilitation efforts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 10 7

Tourist Guide (Orlando, FL)

Age: 43 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The SWIMS Act might decrease the appeal of the aquarium, impacting my job security.
  • It's bittersweet, believing in animal rights but fearing economic loss.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Retired Environmental Lawyer (New York, NY)

Age: 62 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The SWIMS Act is a morally positive shift in handling marine mammals ethically.
  • I am pleased to see legislative action reflecting public calls for animal rights.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 8 6

College Student (Omaha, NE)

Age: 19 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm supportive of policies like SWIMS that enhance animal protection.
  • It gives me hope for a career in marine conservation without compromising ethics.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 5

Animal Rights Activist (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 24 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The SWIMS Act validates what we've been fighting for.
  • It's a victory for animal rights and sets a global precedent.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 10 9
Year 2 10 8
Year 3 10 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 6

Fisherman (Corpus Christi, TX)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm concerned SWIMS might inspire further regulations that could impede fishing operations.
  • I need reassurance that local economies won't be overlooked.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 4
Year 2 4 4
Year 3 4 4
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 5 4

Marketing Executive for Marine Park (Miami, FL)

Age: 31 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Adjusting marketing strategies is challenging but necessary.
  • I believe we can pivot by promoting our educational experiences.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Travel Blogger (Anchorage, AK)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I support the SWIMS Act as it aligns with ethical travel interests.
  • It may change travel plans, but could lead to a richer experience focused on conservation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $20000000)

Year 2: $10000000 (Low: $7000000, High: $15000000)

Year 3: $7000000 (Low: $5000000, High: $12000000)

Year 5: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $10000000)

Year 10: $2000000 (Low: $1000000, High: $5000000)

Year 100: $500000 (Low: $300000, High: $1000000)

Key Considerations