Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8503

Bill Overview

Title: Securing Global Telecommunications Act

Description: This bill requires the Department of State develop and submit to Congress a strategy to promote the use of secure telecommunication infrastructure in countries other than the United States. The State Department must also report to Congress on (1) efforts by China and Russia to advance authoritarian interests or oppose fair, industry-led processes at the International Telecommunication Union, the U.N. agency involved with setting telecommunications standards and related regulatory activities; and (2) opportunities for greater collaboration with allies and partners to promote secure information and communications technology infrastructure in countries other than the United States.

Sponsors: Rep. Manning, Kathy E. [D-NC-6]

Target Audience

Population: Global telecommunications users

Estimated Size: 0

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

International Business Consultant (New York City, NY)

Age: 35 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could streamline my work by ensuring secure communication channels in international projects.
  • It seems like a necessary step in countering geopolitical telecom influences from Russia and China.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Software Developer (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I hope this policy leads to more stable global communications networks.
  • Indirect benefits to American cybersecurity might be significant over time.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Telecommunication Engineer (Chicago, IL)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This is a strategic move to secure telecom globally, which can indirectly enhance U.S. infrastructure.
  • It would be great if the policy includes capacity building in emerging markets.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Academic - International Relations (Houston, TX)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is important for balancing global communication influences.
  • National security indirectly affects individual wellbeing by promoting stability.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Graduate Student - Cybersecurity (Seattle, WA)

Age: 23 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Strategically promoting telecom security can reduce cyber threats long-term.
  • Interested to see how this policy will influence the security curriculum.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Retired (Miami, FL)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think enhancing global telecom security is a smart move.
  • Even as a retiree, I see the ripple effects it could have on privacy and security.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Global NGO Worker (Boston, MA)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Promoting telecom security in developing regions is crucial.
  • This policy could facilitate more secure communications in my work.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Telecom Industry Executive (Denver, CO)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy will strongly influence global telecom market dynamics.
  • Could strategically benefit U.S.-based telecom firms in the long run.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Tech Journalist (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 31 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This is a fascinating policy proposal with potential global impacts.
  • It will be important to monitor how it affects the U.S. telecom sector over time.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

IT Support Specialist (Dallas, TX)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While not directly impacting my work, it's a necessary focus for future security.
  • As a tech enthusiast, the international telecom scene interests me.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $100000000 (Low: $80000000, High: $120000000)

Year 2: $100000000 (Low: $80000000, High: $120000000)

Year 3: $110000000 (Low: $85000000, High: $130000000)

Year 5: $120000000 (Low: $90000000, High: $140000000)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations