Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8483

Bill Overview

Title: Wildfire Insurance Coverage Study Act of 2022

Description: This bill requires studies and reports regarding wildfire risk and damage. Specifically, the Federal Emergency Management Agency must report on trends in wildfire declarations, mitigation practices, state and federal programs regarding wildfire risk, and the need for a national map of wildfire risks. The Government Accountability Office must report on (1) the availability and cost of wildfire insurance coverage for homes and commercial property, (2) state regulatory responses to increasing costs of coverage, and (3) impediments to private wildfire insurance coverage.

Sponsors: Rep. Waters, Maxine [D-CA-43]

Target Audience

Population: People in areas at risk of wildfires

Estimated Size: 3500000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Secondary School Teacher (San Diego, California)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I worry about the increasing wildfire risk each year.
  • Insurance is already costly, and I'm concerned it might become unaffordable.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 4

Retired Firefighter (Portland, Oregon)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I've seen how fires devastate properties in this area.
  • Insurance developments could save our community.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 9 3

Insurance Broker (Reno, Nevada)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Better data and maps will help set more accurate premiums.
  • Clients often struggle with high costs due to fire risk.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 6

Wildlife Ecologist (Santa Fe, New Mexico)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Insurance isn't my main concern, but it's crucial for community planning.
  • Mitigating wildfires protects biodiversity.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 6

Small Business Owner (Landscaping) (Spokane, Washington)

Age: 52 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Better insurance could prevent financial ruin during fires.
  • Current policies are expensive and restrictive.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 7 3
Year 10 8 3
Year 20 8 2

Retired Homeowner (Flagstaff, Arizona)

Age: 65 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm on a tight budget; any insurance hike is troublesome.
  • Improvements in insurance can ease financial pressure.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 6 3
Year 10 7 3
Year 20 6 3

Software Developer (Los Angeles, California)

Age: 34 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 20/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Wildfire insurance isn't something I directly deal with.
  • The policy sounds beneficial for risk-prone area strategies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Real Estate Agent (Colorado Springs, Colorado)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The new data could stabilize the housing market in fire zones.
  • Clients are deterred by unpredictable insurance costs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 6

Agricultural Scientist (Boise, Idaho)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Fire insurance influences agricultural investment decisions.
  • Better policies can help protect farm assets.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

Environmental Attorney (Las Vegas, Nevada)

Age: 37 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Enhanced insurance could support legal measures and client interests.
  • Policy could guide nationwide fire risk strategies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $10000000 (Low: $7500000, High: $12000000)

Year 2: $8000000 (Low: $6000000, High: $10000000)

Year 3: $6000000 (Low: $5000000, High: $9000000)

Year 5: $3000000 (Low: $2000000, High: $8000000)

Year 10: $2000000 (Low: $1000000, High: $7000000)

Year 100: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $5000000)

Key Considerations