Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8455

Bill Overview

Title: Coastal State Climate Preparedness Act of 2022

Description: This bill directs the Department of Commerce to establish a coastal climate change adaptation preparedness and response program. Under the program, Commerce must (1) assist coastal states with voluntarily developing coastal climate change adaptation plans, and (2) provide financial and technical assistance as well as training for coastal states to implement the adaptation plans.

Sponsors: Rep. Carbajal, Salud O. [D-CA-24]

Target Audience

Population: People living in coastal areas

Estimated Size: 148000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Fisherman (Miami, FL)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I am hopeful that this policy will protect my livelihood.
  • Climate change has made fishing unpredictable and sometimes dangerous.
  • Financial assistance for us would be very welcome.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 9 3
Year 20 9 2

Tourist Guide (New Orleans, LA)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think this policy is necessary to protect our beautiful city.
  • Tourism cannot thrive if we keep getting flooded.
  • I hope the assistance reaches us quickly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 8 3
Year 20 8 3

Software Engineer (San Diego, CA)

Age: 27 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm not sure if this will impact me personally.
  • I'm more concerned about rising housing costs due to policy changes.
  • Still, I'm supportive if it helps the community.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 5

Retired (Charleston, SC)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I worry about my home's vulnerability to hurricanes.
  • This policy could bring some peace of mind.
  • Being on a fixed income, any help is appreciated.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 9 4

Hotel Owner (Galveston, TX)

Age: 62 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Our business is always on edge with the hurricane season.
  • If the policy brings more stability, it would help us plan ahead.
  • Financial support for infrastructure would be a game changer.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 4
Year 3 8 3
Year 5 9 2
Year 10 9 2
Year 20 8 2

Environmental Scientist (Seattle, WA)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policies like these are crucial for sustainable living.
  • I'm optimistic about integrating new measures with our existing plans.
  • Long-term resilience funding is key.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 4

Student (Boston, MA)

Age: 30 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy gives me hope for my future career.
  • I'm concerned about long-term impacts on climate change.
  • I hope to see more emphasis on marine conservation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 7 4

Construction Worker (Norfolk, VA)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see firsthand the damage storms cause.
  • Policy support could mean more consistent work.
  • Improved infrastructure is essential.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 4
Year 3 8 4
Year 5 8 3
Year 10 9 2
Year 20 8 2

School Teacher (Savannah, GA)

Age: 46 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Educating our kids about climate is important.
  • I'm hopeful this policy will enhance our community programs.
  • Funding could improve school infrastructure.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 9 4

Retired Engineer (Lansing, MI)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I support any environmental policy.
  • However, this may not affect me directly.
  • Long-term care for natural resources is a good idea.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 6 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $700000000 (Low: $600000000, High: $800000000)

Year 2: $650000000 (Low: $550000000, High: $750000000)

Year 3: $600000000 (Low: $500000000, High: $700000000)

Year 5: $600000000 (Low: $500000000, High: $700000000)

Year 10: $550000000 (Low: $450000000, High: $650000000)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations