Bill Overview
Title: To prevent Federal agencies and contractors from using LOGINK, and for other purposes.
Description: This bill prohibits a federal agency from using LOGINK. LOGINK means the public, open, shared logistics information network known as the National Public Information Platform for Transportation & Logistics by the Ministry of Transport of China. Further, the bill prohibits (1) a federal agency from entering into any contract with an entity that uses LOGINK, and (2) the use of LOGINK in any contract entered into by the agency.
Sponsors: Rep. Steel, Michelle [R-CA-48]
Target Audience
Population: Individuals associated with global logistics and trade industries
Estimated Size: 5000000
- The primary group impacted by this bill includes federal agencies and their existing or potential contractors who may currently use LOGINK for logistics or data-sharing purposes.
- The global logistics companies or entities that are integrated with LOGINK may face challenges if they wish to maintain or pursue contracts with U.S. federal agencies.
- LOGINK, being a platform developed by China's Ministry of Transport, is likely used by a variety of international logistics and trade entities; these global users might reconsider their partnerships with entities that heavily engage with U.S. federal contracts.
Reasoning
- This policy specifically impacts entities involved with federal contracts that rely on logistics information platforms, particularly those tied to China, creating a niche but potentially significant impact on businesses reliant on such technologies.
- The policy might necessitate shifts in logistics frameworks and data-sharing protocols, thus creating a spectrum of impact from low to high, based on how integrated LOGINK is within their business processes.
- U.S.-based logistics companies that have international dealings, particularly with China, will need to reassess their operational logistics platforms, impacting operational costs.
- Not all individuals or entities in global logistics will be affected equally; those without direct links to U.S. federal contracts or reliance on LOGINK will see minimal to no impact.
Simulated Interviews
Logistics Manager (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I have to say, this policy will definitely shake things up for the company. It's not about the platform itself; we’ve just invested so much into integrating LOGINK.
- I'm a bit worried about the adaptation curve. We've gotten used to the efficiencies LOGINK provides in coordination.
- Our contract's worth isn't massive, but it's significant enough that we can't overlook the changes this imposes.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Supply Chain Specialist (Houston, TX)
Age: 35 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 1.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I don't think this will affect us much. We do engage in some federal contracts, but LOGINK isn’t essential for us.
- It's good to see the emphasis on security, though I hope this won't create unnecessary hurdles.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Logistics Consultant (New York, NY)
Age: 28 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Switching from LOGINK might require re-configuring existing setups, which can be challenging within the limited budget and time frames.
- Some of my clients might be concerned about the costs in transitioning to a new system, especially smaller contractors.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Owner of a logistics software company (Seattle, WA)
Age: 55 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Our main concern is having to redesign parts of our software that interface with LOGINK for potential federal contracts.
- This policy could mean new opportunities for us, assuming we adapt quickly.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Import/Export Coordinator (Chicago, IL)
Age: 30 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 18/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Since we’re not dealing directly with federal contracts, this policy won’t really affect us. Our main use of logistics platforms is more regional.
- I think ensuring secure data is always important, but for us, it's not the immediate concern.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Federal Contract Manager (Miami, FL)
Age: 40 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 7.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy would require us to pivot to another logistics platform ASAP, which could disrupt ongoing projects.
- Security is crucial, but I’m definitely worried about the short-term cost implications of switching platforms.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
Senior Policy Advisor (Atlanta, GA)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 1.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This is a much-needed move to protect our logistics infrastructure. The federal adoption of LOGINK always seemed a risky choice.
- It's a necessary shift. The challenge will be how agencies manage the transition without service disruption.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Federal Agency Director (Washington, D.C.)
Age: 60 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It’s a tough situation; we have to ensure compliance without lag in operations.
- The change-over is daunting, but it must be done. I hope we receive enough support in making the transition smooth.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 5 |
International Trade Consultant (San Diego, CA)
Age: 33 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 9
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 16/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy's impact on my clients could vary, but generally, since they’re not dealing with federal contracts directly, it’s expected to be minimal.
- Awareness of such policy shifts is crucial for informed advising, but immediate impact is low.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 9 |
Operations Director (Dallas, TX)
Age: 38 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I see this as both a challenge and an opportunity to modernize our logistics with more controllable alternatives.
- Hopefully, the transition can enhance competitive aspects domestically.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $25000000)
Year 2: $18000000 (Low: $14000000, High: $22000000)
Year 3: $16000000 (Low: $13000000, High: $20000000)
Year 5: $15000000 (Low: $12000000, High: $18000000)
Year 10: $12000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $14000000)
Year 100: $1200000 (Low: $1000000, High: $1500000)
Key Considerations
- Ensuring compliance among agencies and contractors will be crucial to minimizing operational disruptions.
- Balancing national security concerns with economic impact on the logistics industry will be sensitive.
- Potential need for temporary waivers or transition periods for critical service providers.