Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8428

Bill Overview

Title: Allowing Greater Access to Safe and Effective Contraception Act

Description: This bill requires the Food and Drug Administration to prioritize review of supplemental applications for over-the counter oral contraceptives that are intended for routine use. It also removes certain limitations in relation to such products and health savings accounts, flexible spending arrangements, and other arrangements (e.g., limitations on the number of items that may be purchased).

Sponsors: Rep. Hinson, Ashley [R-IA-1]

Target Audience

Population: People of reproductive age, primarily women, globally

Estimated Size: 72000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

nurse (Austin, TX)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As a healthcare worker, I see the importance of empowerment through healthcare choices.
  • This policy will make it easier for me to continue my job without worrying about access due to prescriptions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

college student (Chicago, IL)

Age: 19 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 17/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Over-the-counter access is a game changer for students who juggle a lot of responsibilities.
  • It will be one less thing to stress about while managing school and work life.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

marketing manager (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 43 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 20/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think it's an important policy but it doesn't affect me directly right now.
  • Access to birth control should be hassle-free for those who need it.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

photographer (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 36 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Happy that my partner might have easier access.
  • It's good for couples to have more control over planning.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

real estate agent (Miami, FL)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This won't directly influence my life.
  • It seems positive for younger generations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 9 9
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 9

software engineer (Portland, OR)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm excited that this might make planning easier.
  • Access without prescriptions will reduce my worry about family planning timing.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

graphic designer (Seattle, WA)

Age: 25 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Costs of healthcare are a burden right now.
  • Cheaper and easier access to contraceptives would alleviate some financial stress.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 8 6

high school student (New York, NY)

Age: 16 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's good to know I'll have options when I'm ready.
  • Talks with my parents about these choices are important.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

accountant (Denver, CO)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Happy my wife can access what she needs more easily.
  • Less bureaucracy in healthcare is always a plus.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

teacher (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 27 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I like that this gives me flexibility before starting a family.
  • Saving on costs will help as a teacher with a modest salary.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $25000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $30000000)

Year 2: $25000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $30000000)

Year 3: $25000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $30000000)

Year 5: $25000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $30000000)

Year 10: $25000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $30000000)

Year 100: $25000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $30000000)

Key Considerations