Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8405

Bill Overview

Title: Protecting Access to Medication Abortion Act

Description: This bill directs the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to take steps to allow patients to receive prescriptions for mifepristone, a drug approved by the FDA for medical abortion, via telehealth and for prescriptions for the drug to be filled by mail. (Mifepristone is subject to a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, which imposes various safety-related requirements. During the COVID-19 public health emergency, the FDA suspended enforcement of the current strategy's requirement that the drug must be dispensed in person, and this suspension is still in effect. In December 2021, the FDA stated the data supported modifying the strategy to remove the in-person dispensing requirement.) Under this bill, the FDA must require the holder of the relevant approved drug application to submit a proposal to modify the strategy. The modification shall (1) remove the in-person dispensing requirement, (2) allow patients to access prescriptions for mifepristone via telehealth, and (3) authorize all pharmacies certified to dispense mifepristone to patients to do so via mail.

Sponsors: Rep. Bush, Cori [D-MO-1]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals seeking medication abortion, particularly women of childbearing age

Estimated Size: 1000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

student (rural Texas)

Age: 23 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy could offer me a safer and more private way to access medication abortion without traveling to a distant clinic, which is both costly and time-consuming.
  • I believe this will provide crucial access for people like me who might have limited support networks.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 8 4
Year 3 8 3
Year 5 9 3
Year 10 9 3
Year 20 9 3

graphic designer (Los Angeles)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I may not be directly impacted since clinics are accessible, but I believe telehealth options can provide more privacy and convenience.
  • This policy supports the right to choose and access necessary healthcare without stigma.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

healthcare administrator (New York City)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy will reinforce the importance of equal healthcare access and support the use of telehealth in improving women's health services.
  • I'm optimistic about the reduction of barriers for women across the country.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 5

stay-at-home parent (Midwest region, USA)

Age: 33 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Our healthcare access is quite limited, so providing remote access to necessary services would be a significant relief.
  • I feel that being able to receive medication by mail with a telehealth prescription is a step forward.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 7 4
Year 3 8 4
Year 5 9 3
Year 10 9 3
Year 20 8 3

software engineer (Seattle)

Age: 26 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 16/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While I don't require these services, I support policies that enhance healthcare access through technology.
  • This law is about equity and ensuring everyone can access what they need.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

middle school teacher (Florida)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 12.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy would make a significant difference in communities like mine where seeking an abortion can lead to social backlash.
  • It provides a necessary degree of separation between patients and judgment.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 6
Year 2 9 5
Year 3 9 5
Year 5 9 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 8 3

small business owner (Mississippi)

Age: 44 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think this policy could provide crucial options for people like us who have family obligations and can't afford time and money for out-of-state travel.
  • Access needs to be safe and discrete, and I hope this change brings that.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

legal consultant (Chicago)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy aligns with the advocacy work we're pushing for, ensuring access and rights are preserved.
  • Having a framework for telehealth is a future-forward approach that we need.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

student (college town in Pennsylvania)

Age: 21 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • A policy like this can lower the barriers significantly, both financially and emotionally.
  • Insurance is a big issue for students, so telehealth can reduce overall costs significantly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 4
Year 2 7 3
Year 3 7 3
Year 5 8 3
Year 10 7 3
Year 20 6 3

healthcare worker (Atlanta, Georgia)

Age: 27 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see firsthand how hard it can be for people to access healthcare services they need, and believe this policy could alleviate such issues.
  • It's essential to adapt to new methods of healthcare delivery.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $50000000 (Low: $30000000, High: $70000000)

Year 2: $45000000 (Low: $25000000, High: $65000000)

Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations