Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8401

Bill Overview

Title: Transit Oriented Development Act of 2022

Description: This bill increases the low-income housing tax credit for buildings in transit-oriented development areas. The bill defines a transit-oriented development area as a designated area located within 1/2 mile from a rail, bus, harbor, or waterway station and zoned for high density. It also provides for an increase in the credit for buildings in high cost areas in non-contiguous states (i.e., Alaska and Hawaii) and U.S. possessions. The bill directs the Department of Housing and Urban Development to study cost-of-living differences throughout the United States based on geographic location and proximity and accessibility to transit.

Sponsors: Rep. Kahele, Kaiali'i [D-HI-2]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals living in transit-oriented development areas worldwide

Estimated Size: 60000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Retail Manager (Brooklyn, NY)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I worry about rent increases every year.
  • Living near the subway is essential for my commute to work.
  • Affordable housing in the area would be a big relief financially.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Remote IT Technician (Anchorage, AK)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Rent here is really high, especially for working from home.
  • Access to affordable housing would be great but I'm not sure it'll reach us directly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Public School Teacher (Miami, FL)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • We could use better housing options closer to transit, but I'm not sure this will reach my area.
  • Commutes are time-consuming without nearby options.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Software Engineer (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm interested in how this could affect my investments in areas close to transit.
  • It's always good for the city to have more affordable housing.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 8 7

Retired Nurse (Honolulu, HI)

Age: 62 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Housing costs are too high for retirees like me.
  • I'm hopeful this could lead to affordable options closer to bus stops because every little bit helps.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Barista (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 26 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It'd be awesome if more affordable housing popped up around here.
  • Downtown is great, but some areas are too expensive for us.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 6

Construction Worker (Dallas, TX)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Rent control would benefit us greatly.
  • I'm skeptical if anything will change unless it's proven we benefit directly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Nurse (Chicago, IL)

Age: 31 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Any improvements in affordable housing here would be great.
  • Rent and living expenses are a constant stress.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 7

Freelance Graphic Designer (Seattle, WA)

Age: 45 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I've seen rents rising, and I'm concerned.
  • It's an exciting opportunity if these policies make affordable housing more available.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Musician (New Orleans, LA)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Affordable housing is critical for me.
  • This act sounds promising if it includes my area.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $1500000000 (Low: $1000000000, High: $2000000000)

Year 2: $1600000000 (Low: $1100000000, High: $2100000000)

Year 3: $1700000000 (Low: $1200000000, High: $2200000000)

Year 5: $1800000000 (Low: $1300000000, High: $2300000000)

Year 10: $1900000000 (Low: $1400000000, High: $2400000000)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations