Bill Overview
Title: Multilateral Leadership Act
Description: This bill prohibits the President from exercising authorities under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to regulate or prohibit financial transactions of United Nations programs, funds, agencies, or entities, or to block the property of persons working for the United Nations and its related organizations.
Sponsors: Rep. Castro, Joaquin [D-TX-20]
Target Audience
Population: People engaged with or benefiting from UN programs
Estimated Size: 50000
- The primary target population for this bill includes individuals and entities engaged with UN programs and operations, as their financial transactions and funds are protected from certain presidential powers.
- UN employees and contractors globally would be directly affected since their property cannot be blocked as it might have been previously.
- Beneficiaries of UN programs, which include a wide range of vulnerable populations around the world, are indirectly impacted since the financial and operational stability of UN programs could be maintained.
- The United Nations (UN) as an international organization and its numerous entities worldwide will also be directly impacted by this bill.
Reasoning
- The Multilateral Leadership Act primarily impacts individuals directly engaged with or benefiting from UN programs. In the US, this includes American citizens working for the UN, those linked through collaborations, or those benefiting indirectly from UN programs supporting global stability. The budget constraints limit direct financial impacts within the US, focusing more on regulatory aspects.
- Given the budget of $500,000 in the first year and $5 million over ten years, the policy won't have widespread direct economic benefits or detriments for Americans unless they are specifically involved with UN financial transactions or programs. This means most effects will be regulatory or reassurance for those working with the UN.
- The primary target population defined in the policy are relatively niche, as they are mostly specialized workers or organizations tied to UN activities, explaining the uncommonness factor.
- The policy's direct impact on the average American citizen is minimal unless they're involved in international or diplomatic sectors. However, some might report indirect preferences based on how US foreign policy and humanitarian efforts are perceived.
Simulated Interviews
UN staff member (New York, NY)
Age: 34 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I feel more secure about my job knowing the US government won't impose financial barriers on our operations.
- This policy strengthens our ability to implement initiatives without fear of sudden disruption due to foreign political decisions.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
Non-profit director (Washington, D.C.)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy aligns well with our objectives to maintain stable partnerships with the UN.
- I appreciate that we won't have to navigate financial roadblocks.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Tech entrepreneur (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 29 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's reassuring to know we have fewer regulatory hurdles when working on UN contracts.
- I believe this stability could lead to more business opportunities.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Retired diplomat (Chicago, IL)
Age: 60 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- While I'm retired, I'm pleased to see policies that keep international cooperation smooth.
- This shows a commitment to global stability.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
University student (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 22 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's promising to see laws that safeguard international cooperation with organizations like the UN.
- This strengthens my interest in pursuing a career in international diplomacy.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Engineer (Houston, TX)
Age: 39 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy doesn't affect my daily life significantly, but knowing our contracts are secure is a plus.
- I'm content if policies stabilize international project funding.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 4 |
Healthcare worker (Seattle, WA)
Age: 53 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- My concern has always been the continuity of funding, and this policy helps address that.
- It reassures me on a professional level.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Academic researcher (Boston, MA)
Age: 30 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 7.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy supports my research interests since it exemplifies US commitment to international agreements.
- It's beneficial for maintaining research funding stability.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
NGO worker (Miami, FL)
Age: 28 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The stability this policy promises allows us to plan long-term projects without fear of sudden cut-offs from the US.
- It's crucial for our field.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Investment banker (Denver, CO)
Age: 48 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Although my work doesn't directly involve the UN, knowing these policies maintain stability helps mitigate market uncertainties.
- It's a positive move for international financial collaboration.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $500000 (Low: $250000, High: $750000)
Year 2: $500000 (Low: $250000, High: $750000)
Year 3: $500000 (Low: $250000, High: $750000)
Year 5: $500000 (Low: $250000, High: $750000)
Year 10: $500000 (Low: $250000, High: $750000)
Year 100: $500000 (Low: $250000, High: $750000)
Key Considerations
- Indirect effects on international partnerships and UN-related activities need to be monitored for broader diplomatic benefits.
- The bill could strengthen US-UN relations by ensuring the smooth continuation of UN programs involving American entities.
- Minimal administrative costs are expected but should be tracked to prevent budgetary overruns.