Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8358

Bill Overview

Title: Food Safety Administration Act of 2022

Description: This bill splits the current Food and Drug Administration into the Federal Drug Administration (to regulate drugs, cosmetics, devices, biological products, color additives, and tobacco) and the Food Safety Administration (to regulate food safety). The bill also establishes specific requirements with respect to manufacturers of infant formula, such as requiring manufacturers to notify the newly created Food Safety Administration of potential infant formula shortages.

Sponsors: Rep. DeLauro, Rosa L. [D-CT-3]

Target Audience

Population: People consuming food products regulated by the U.S., including those influenced by U.S. regulations globally

Estimated Size: 330000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Infant Formula Manufacturer Employee (Austin, TX)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think the split makes sense; a dedicated agency for food safety could result in better standards.
  • The emphasis on infant formula is crucial, as shortages can have severe impacts on families.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Restaurant Owner (New York, NY)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I’m concerned about the implementation and how quickly we can adapt to new regulations.
  • It might increase costs in the short term, but I hope for better safety in the long run.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Food Scientist (Seattle, WA)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Finally, food safety gets its distinct attention.
  • In the long term, this could lead to better research and safety protocols.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 10 8
Year 20 10 8

Stay-at-home Parent (Chicago, IL)

Age: 27 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm worried about the formula shortages, any step to prevent these shortages is welcome.
  • It's good to have someone explicitly responsible for food safety.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 5

Farmer (Des Moines, IA)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This will mean adjusting to new regulations but could improve safety standards.
  • I’m curious how this will change interactions with manufacturers.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Food Distributor (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Splitting the FDA could streamline processes, but I'm concerned about increased paperwork and costs.
  • Still, it might bring longer-term benefits by increasing trust in our supply chains.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

Retired (Miami, FL)

Age: 65 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Anything that ensures safer food is good, though I don't directly feel the impact.
  • It's a big change that might not reach consumers like me immediately.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

College Student (Boston, MA)

Age: 22 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see the point, but it doesn’t seem like it will affect me directly at least in the short-term.
  • Having dedicated agencies seems reasonable in theory.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Student (Houston, TX)

Age: 12 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • My parents say this might mean safer food at school, which sounds good.
  • I don't totally understand, but it seems like they're trying to help.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Food Safety Inspector (Cleveland, OH)

Age: 68 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This restructuring could enhance the focus and resources for food safety.
  • It might mean more jobs and clarity in our roles.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 10 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $1500000000 (Low: $1250000000, High: $1750000000)

Year 2: $1300000000 (Low: $1100000000, High: $1600000000)

Year 3: $1200000000 (Low: $1000000000, High: $1450000000)

Year 5: $1100000000 (Low: $900000000, High: $1350000000)

Year 10: $900000000 (Low: $700000000, High: $1200000000)

Year 100: $500000000 (Low: $300000000, High: $900000000)

Key Considerations