Bill Overview
Title: New Orleans Jazz National Historical Park Study Act of 2022
Description: . This bill directs the Department of the Interior to conduct a study to assess the suitability and feasibility of designating a study area as the New Orleans Jazz National Historical Park. The study area shall include the portions of the park and surrounding areas that are comprised of Louis Armstrong Park.
Sponsors: Rep. Carter, Troy [D-LA-2]
Target Audience
Population: People interested in the New Orleans Jazz National Historical Park
Estimated Size: 500000
- The bill focuses on designating a study area for a potential New Orleans Jazz National Historical Park.
- The primary stakeholders include people residing in or frequently visiting New Orleans, particularly those with an interest in cultural and historical preservation.
- Tourists with an interest in jazz, history, and unique cultural experiences will be impacted.
- Jazz musicians and enthusiasts who consider New Orleans a cultural hub are relevant stakeholders.
- Local businesses that could benefit from a potential increase in tourism due to the park's designation will also be affected.
- The global jazz community, which recognizes New Orleans as the birthplace of jazz, may have interests in such developments.
Reasoning
- The primary impact of the policy will be localized to New Orleans and areas immediately surrounding the proposed park. This includes residents, business owners, musicians, and tourists.
- The policy is expected to provide economic benefits through increased tourism, potentially increasing job opportunities and local business revenues.
- Cultural and historical stakeholders will experience non-economic benefits through heightened recognition of jazz as an important cultural heritage.
- A small proportion of the population will experience no direct impact as the policy is highly localized and specific to jazz interests, which are niche compared to broader cultural activities.
- Considering the costs and policy limits, the primary population served will be those who can directly access or benefit from the park and its activities.
Simulated Interviews
Jazz Musician (New Orleans, LA)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm excited about the prospect of the Jazz National Historical Park because it could bring more exposure to our music.
- This could lead to more gigs and opportunities for local musicians like me.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 10 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 10 | 5 |
Cultural Historian (New Orleans, LA)
Age: 30 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The park would be a boon to education and awareness efforts around jazz history.
- It could help preserve cultural artifacts and stories that are at risk of being forgotten.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 5 |
Jazz Enthusiast (Houston, TX)
Age: 55 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I visit New Orleans often and the new park would definitely be on my itinerary.
- However, since I don't live there, the impact is mostly on my travel plans and enjoyment.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
College Student (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 24 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 20/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The park seems interesting, but it won't impact my life directly unless I visit New Orleans specifically for this.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Restaurant Owner (New Orleans, LA)
Age: 38 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Any increase in tourists is beneficial for my business.
- I'm hopeful that the park will attract more visitors to the area.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 4 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 4 |
Retired (Seattle, WA)
Age: 67 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 14/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I might consider visiting New Orleans more frequently if there are new attractions related to jazz.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Tour Guide (New Orleans, LA)
Age: 29 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This park could make my tours more popular as it would be another point of interest for tourists.
- I hope it boosts interest in jazz history.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
City Planner (New Orleans, LA)
Age: 40 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The park could significantly enhance our cultural assets and city planning efforts.
- It's important to ensure that it integrates well with local needs and doesn't over-commercialize the area.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
Jazz Festival Organizer (New York, NY)
Age: 52 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This could be an interesting venue for hosting events or collaborating with local musicians.
- It might not directly affect my work but adds a potential venue.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Retired Teacher (Baton Rouge, LA)
Age: 65 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 11/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I love the idea of promoting jazz history to younger generations.
- This park could be a great educational resource.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $500000 (Low: $300000, High: $700000)
Year 2: $500000 (Low: $300000, High: $700000)
Year 3: $500000 (Low: $300000, High: $700000)
Year 5: $500000 (Low: $300000, High: $700000)
Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Key Considerations
- The study's estimates are constrained by its scope and only consider costs directly associated with conducting the feasibility research.
- Long-term impacts such as increased tourism or cultural preservation due to potential park designation are outside the immediate cost assessment.
- Any decision post-study to establish the park would result in separate analyses and potential future spending.