Bill Overview
Title: Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2023
Description: This bill provides FY2023 appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, and related programs. The bill provides appropriations to the State Department for Administration of Foreign Affairs, International Organizations, and International Commissions. The bill provides appropriations for related agencies and programs, including the U.S. Agency for Global Media, the Asia Foundation, the U.S. Institute of Peace, the Center for Middle Eastern-Western Dialogue Trust Fund, the Eisenhower Exchange Fellowship Program, the Israeli Arab Scholarship Program, the East-West Center, and the National Endowment for Democracy. The bill provides appropriations for other commissions, including the Commission for the Preservation of America's Heritage Abroad, the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, the Congressional-Executive Commission on the People's Republic of China, and the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. The bill provides appropriations to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the State Department and the President for International Security Assistance, and the President and International Financial Institutions for Multilateral Assistance. The bill provides appropriations for bilateral economic assistance, including programs and activities conducted by the President; the State Department; Independent Agencies, including the Peace Corps, the Millennium Challenge Corporation, the Inter-American Foundation, and the U.S. African Development Foundation; and the Department of the Treasury. The bill provides appropriations for export and investment assistance to the Export-Import Bank of the United States, the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation, and the U.S. Trade and Development Agency. The bill sets forth requirements and restrictions for using funds provided by this and other appropriations acts.
Sponsors: Rep. Lee, Barbara [D-CA-13]
Target Audience
Population: People affected by U.S. foreign aid, diplomacy, and related international programs
Estimated Size: 500000
- The bill impacts individuals involved in or benefiting from foreign operations funded by the U.S. government.
- People working for the U.S. Department of State or associated international organizations will be affected.
- Beneficiaries include participants in international exchanges, scholarships, and fellowships funded by these programs.
- People involved in bilateral economic activities, such as those benefiting from USAID projects, will be impacted.
- Employees and stakeholders in agencies like the Peace Corps, Export-Import Bank, and others under the bill will be impacted.
- The global population impacted includes individuals in countries where U.S. foreign assistance is active.
Reasoning
- The policy directly impacts individuals working within or benefiting from U.S. international programs and institutions, such as state employees, participants in exchange programs, and international assistance beneficiaries.
- The policy's budget constraints and strategic targets focus on developing international relations and economic growth, which correlates to gradual long-term effects on wellbeing.
- Due to the nature of foreign operations, the immediate impact on domestic wellbeing might be low to moderate depending on direct involvement or indirect economic benefits.
- People working in international development and diplomacy are expected to report the highest changes in wellbeing due to increased job stability and program effectiveness under improved funding.
- Participants in international exchange, scholarship, and fellowship programs funded by these appropriations will likely experience professional growth and enhanced networking opportunities.
- There's limited direct impact on the general population not engaged with foreign affairs, but potential secondary effects through economic relationships and security.
Simulated Interviews
Foreign Service Officer (Washington, D.C.)
Age: 34 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The increase in appropriations is beneficial for ensuring we have the necessary resources to promote U.S. interests abroad.
- It might improve job security and open new opportunities for career advancement within the State Department.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Peace Corps Volunteer Coordinator (New York, NY)
Age: 28 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 14/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Increased funding could lead to more organized and impactful projects where our volunteers operate.
- This could enhance the experience for both volunteers and the communities they serve.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Program Administrator for USAID (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- More consistent funding means we can plan long-term projects with further reach.
- It allows for innovation and improvement of programs which is crucial for sustainable development.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
International Business Executive (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 31 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy creates great opportunities for fostering stable international trade relationships.
- Increased diplomatic efforts enhance global stability, benefiting international business.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Academic Researcher (Chicago, IL)
Age: 39 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 16/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Increased funding might support new research opportunities and international collaboration.
- Promoting peace and development abroad can have indirect benefits on societal stability and wellbeing in the U.S.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Export-Import Bank Analyst (Houston, TX)
Age: 50 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 11/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Greater appropriations improve credit guarantees and financing for U.S. exporters.
- This could lead to increased job security and a robust domestic economic condition.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Graduate Student in International Studies (Miami, FL)
Age: 23 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- If the scholarship is funded appropriately, it could greatly reduce my financial burden and provide invaluable experience.
- Such opportunities are crucial for personal and career development in international fields.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Security Analyst (Atlanta, GA)
Age: 42 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 13/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Appropriations supporting commissions like the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review improve diplomatic efforts.
- This budget could help better understand geopolitical dynamics, which is vital for national security.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
International NGO Worker (Boston, MA)
Age: 29 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 17/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Additional funding will allow us to reach more communities and expand our health programs.
- It will enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of our interventions in developing countries.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Domestic Policy Advisor (Phoenix, AZ)
Age: 37 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 18/20
Statement of Opinion:
- While not directly impacting my work, improved international relations could lead to better economic partnerships.
- The appropriations could indirectly enhance domestic economic policies through increased trade.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $58000000000 (Low: $55000000000, High: $62000000000)
Year 2: $60000000000 (Low: $57000000000, High: $64000000000)
Year 3: $62000000000 (Low: $59000000000, High: $66000000000)
Year 5: $65000000000 (Low: $62000000000, High: $69000000000)
Year 10: $71000000000 (Low: $68000000000, High: $75000000000)
Year 100: $90000000000 (Low: $85000000000, High: $95000000000)
Key Considerations
- Annual appropriations require diligent annual review to ensure necessary adjustments.
- Geopolitical situations could significantly impact the level and focus of appropriations.
- Economic partnerships and global market influences could alter financial needs and outcomes.