Bill Overview
Title: Housing Innovation Act of 2022
Description: This bill establishes the Office of Housing Innovation within the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The office must establish grant programs to support (1) planning efforts that address housing needs in urban areas; (2) research and studies to support, inform, and advise local governments on their plans for new housing and community development; and (3) outreach programs focused on issues related to housing, community development, and regional planning. The Government Accountability Office must report on the effectiveness of the grant programs.
Sponsors: Rep. DeSaulnier, Mark [D-CA-11]
Target Audience
Population: People in urban areas affected by the Housing Innovation Act of 2022
Estimated Size: 500000
- The bill impacts individuals involved in urban planning and housing development, which primarily includes city planners, local government officials, and community development organizations.
- The legislation aims to address housing needs in urban areas, so individuals living in urban areas will be indirectly affected as planning efforts mature and new housing developments are proposed and constructed.
- By establishing outreach programs related to housing and community development, individuals in urban communities, particularly those in underserved areas, may experience direct impacts in terms of increased community engagement and improved housing policies.
- This bill could lead to increased funding and resources for housing initiatives, which in turn could affect a large population residing in urban areas directly or indirectly.
Reasoning
- Given the policy's emphasis on urban development and planning, the individuals directly impacted will likely include urban planners, housing developers, local government officials, and potentially residents of newly developed urban areas.
- The budget constraints suggest that while the policy could have a broad indirect impact, the direct impact will be more focused on urban areas with high housing needs.
- Those living in urban areas could experience a variety of impacts on wellbeing, primarily through improved housing conditions or increased engagement in community development efforts.
Simulated Interviews
Urban Planner (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy could provide much-needed funding for affordable housing projects we're currently working on.
- The grants could help us develop better infrastructure and housing plans tailored to our community's needs.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Community Organizer (Detroit, MI)
Age: 32 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- If implemented well, this policy could significantly improve housing conditions in our community.
- I am hopeful that the outreach programs will empower residents to participate in urban planning.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 4 |
Real Estate Developer (New York, NY)
Age: 54 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This could open up new opportunities for sustainable housing projects.
- I'm optimistic about potential partnerships with local governments.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
College Student (Seattle, WA)
Age: 28 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy might provide us with better opportunities to study real-world urban challenges.
- Glad to see the government investing in future housing solutions.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Local Government Official (Houston, TX)
Age: 40 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I expect the policy to streamline some bureaucratic processes in urban development.
- Funds can help in implementing long-awaited projects.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Retired (Chicago, IL)
Age: 60 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I hope this policy brings more affordable housing to our area.
- Looking for ways community voices can be included in planning.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Non-profit Director (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 38 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This could bring more resources to our programs.
- It's crucial that the policy addresses specific needs of homeless populations.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Public Health Researcher (Phoenix, AZ)
Age: 50 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I see potential for better integration of health considerations in housing policies.
- Excited about the possibility of comprehensive community studies.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Tech Professional (Miami, FL)
Age: 25 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm hopeful that this policy could stabilize housing prices in the future.
- I would like to see more tech integration in housing solutions.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
High School Teacher (Boston, MA)
Age: 48 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I hope we see more stable housing solutions for families.
- Students' academic performance suffers when they're constantly moving because of housing issues.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $150000000 (Low: $120000000, High: $180000000)
Year 2: $130000000 (Low: $100000000, High: $160000000)
Year 3: $140000000 (Low: $110000000, High: $170000000)
Year 5: $150000000 (Low: $120000000, High: $180000000)
Year 10: $160000000 (Low: $130000000, High: $190000000)
Year 100: $200000000 (Low: $150000000, High: $250000000)
Key Considerations
- Determining the scope and size of grant sizes will significantly affect overall costs.
- Tracking and measuring the effectiveness of the grant programs will be key to ensure the money is well-spent and program goals are achieved.
- The speed at which cities can implement planning and innovate using these grants will impact the effectiveness of the program.
- Coordination across different levels of government and agencies will be necessary to reach the full potential of this bill's objectives.