Bill Overview
Title: Federal Interior Land Media Act
Description: This bill rewrites provisions for commercial filming activities or similar projects in National Park System units and on other federal lands.
Sponsors: Rep. Fulcher, Russ [R-ID-1]
Target Audience
Population: people involved in or affected by commercial filming on federal lands
Estimated Size: 3000000
- The bill affects commercial filming activities, suggesting it will impact the film industry, which plans to conduct projects on federal lands.
- National Park System units and other federal lands are popular sites for filming, especially for nature documentaries and outdoor scenes in films.
- The bill may also impact federal employees overseeing the land, commercial filmmakers, crew, and related industries such as transportation and catering.
- Since the bill affects 'federal lands,' it might also indirectly impact tourists and local businesses that rely on tourism generated by filming activities.
Reasoning
- The FILM Act primarily influences the commercial film industry and associated activities on federal lands, implying a direct impact on filmmakers, government employees, and related businesses.
- Considering the budgetary constraints, the policy might prioritize larger, more impactful filming projects early on to maximize economic and social benefits.
- Federal employees managing permits and site logistics are a key demographic as they directly implement and enforce aspects of the new policy.
- People residing in proximity to popular filming sites may experience noticeable economic and social changes due to fluctuating film-related tourism and business activities.
- Filmmakers and production companies may see significant alterations in cost structures or logistical planning, impacting their operational decisions.
Simulated Interviews
Film Producer (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 48 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The FILM Act could either simplify or complicate my work depending on the final rules.
- Ensuring that we maintain stringent environmental standards is crucial.
- Budget provisions under this act might enable more projects if managed well.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
National Park Ranger (Jackson, WY)
Age: 34 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy will mean revising how we handle film requests, potentially increasing my workload.
- I hope the FILM Act provides additional resources for conservation, given the expected increase in filming projects.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 4 |
Camera Operator (Atlanta, GA)
Age: 29 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I value the accessibility to stunning locations that this act could streamline.
- There might be more jobs from movies and series focused on natural settings.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Government Policy Analyst (Washington, D.C.)
Age: 56 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The FILM Act should carefully balance economic benefits with preservation of our natural resources.
- Implementation will likely involve reevaluating current policy frameworks.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Local Business Owner (Moab, UT)
Age: 40 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The change might increase my client base as more films are scheduled in the parks.
- Sustained economic benefits depend on consistent filming permits.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Documentary Filmmaker (Seattle, WA)
Age: 37 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 11/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The revised provisions could affect how quickly we can set up shoots.
- I'm expecting clearer guidelines on what is permissible, supporting faster project turnaround.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Environmental Activist (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 25 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 4
Duration of Impact: 7.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Concerned about increased disturbance to wildlife if filming activities ramp up.
- Supporting sustainable filming practices is essential for this policy to succeed.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 4 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 4 |
Wildlife Conservationist (Santa Fe, NM)
Age: 60 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 18/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Ensuring the FILM Act incorporates environmental assessments is crucial.
- I'm cautiously optimistic about the prospect of funding for conservation efforts.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Transportation Service Provider (Phoenix, AZ)
Age: 43 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 4.0 years
Commonness: 13/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Increased filming could mean more business, but it also depends on how often and where they film.
- My services might need to adapt to cater to stricter policies and environmental standards.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Park Maintenance Staff (Montana)
Age: 52 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The FILM Act could lead to more work concerning site preparation and clean-up.
- Hoping for increased staff or resources to manage additional duties.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 4 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $1500000)
Year 2: $1100000 (Low: $550000, High: $1600000)
Year 3: $1200000 (Low: $600000, High: $1700000)
Year 5: $1400000 (Low: $700000, High: $1900000)
Year 10: $1500000 (Low: $750000, High: $2000000)
Year 100: $2000000 (Low: $1000000, High: $3000000)
Key Considerations
- The bill affects a significant portion of the U.S. film industry, potentially influencing domestic economic activities related to film production.
- Environmental compliance and protection of National Park units remain important considerations, possibly affecting policy implementation costs.
- Monitoring and administrative costs are expected to be particularly influential in the first few years as systems are established.