Bill Overview
Title: CHIPPING IN Act of 2022
Description: This bill requires the National Science Foundation to award funds to institutions of higher education and nonprofits to support workforce and educational development in microelectronics.
Sponsors: Rep. Stevens, Haley M. [D-MI-11]
Target Audience
Population: people who will undergo workforce and educational training in microelectronics
Estimated Size: 200000
- The bill aims to support workforce and educational development in microelectronics.
- Microelectronics is a global industry impacting electronics manufacturing worldwide.
- The educational institutions and nonprofits receiving funds may have a broad reach, potentially impacting a large number of students and sectors worldwide.
- Microelectronics industry influences numerous applications in communications, healthcare, automation, and consumer electronics, implying a broad potential global impact.
Reasoning
- Microelectronics is a rapidly growing field, and educational initiatives like the CHIPPING IN Act aim to align the workforce with industry needs, creating more job opportunities.
- The population directly impacted includes students, recent graduates, and professionals seeking reskilling or upskilling in microelectronics due to its vital role in technology sectors.
- Given the funding limitations, the impact is expected primarily within educational institutions that can effectively distribute resources to enhance the curriculum and facilities suited to microelectronics training.
- The broad applicability of microelectronics suggests that the policy should enhance technological capabilities and foster innovation, increasing societal wellbeing over time as careers stabilize.
- Many people currently in or entering relevant STEM fields may experience increased opportunities, but the longer-term effects hinge on continuous adaptation to technological shifts.
Simulated Interviews
Computer Science Student (Boston, MA)
Age: 22 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I think this policy can be beneficial as it aligns with my career interests in tech and microelectronics.
- Getting additional resources could mean more lab equipment and opportunities for hands-on projects, which are critical for my learning.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Microelectronics Technician (Phoenix, AZ)
Age: 35 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Additional training opportunities funded by this initiative would help me keep up with industry standards.
- I hope there will be affordable and accessible courses directly targeting people like me who are already working in the field.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Software Engineer (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 28 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 1.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's exciting to see initiatives supporting training in microelectronics since this can help diversify my career.
- I am particularly interested in support for advanced training and certifications.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 9 |
Professor of Electrical Engineering (Austin, TX)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I believe increased funding will catalyze research and practical projects, beneficial for both faculty and students.
- We can likely update our facilities and stay competitive with other institutions in microelectronics education.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 10 | 9 |
| Year 20 | 10 | 9 |
Unemployed (Chicago, IL)
Age: 30 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 4
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy gives me hope since it could mean free or subsidized training programs to enter a promising industry.
- Gaining practical skills will be essential for securing a job in today's market.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
High School Teacher (Little Rock, AR)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I see this as an opportunity to enhance our curriculum and strengthen ties with local community colleges.
- It is essential to keep students updated with skills industries require to promote future employment.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Microelectronics Design Engineer (Raleigh, NC)
Age: 39 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I support initiatives like this one to keep our industry competitive globally.
- The challenge is ensuring enough skilled workers; hence, educational development is crucial.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 9 |
Graduate Student (Seattle, WA)
Age: 24 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 4.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Getting more funding means enhanced research capabilities, which can boost my academic output.
- This can also translate into better job prospects post-graduation.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Project Manager in Tech Company (San Jose, CA)
Age: 42 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 1.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Long-term talent development in microelectronics is key for sustaining project output and innovation.
- Education-focused policies provide a foundation, but they must match the pace of industry needs.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 9 |
Retired Engineer (New York, NY)
Age: 60 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I think it's a good step forward, though I hope the implementation considers practical training alongside theoretical knowledge.
- It's fulfilling to volunteer and share industry knowledge with students trying to enter the field.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $250000000 (Low: $200000000, High: $300000000)
Year 2: $500000000 (Low: $400000000, High: $600000000)
Year 3: $750000000 (Low: $600000000, High: $900000000)
Year 5: $1000000000 (Low: $800000000, High: $1200000000)
Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Key Considerations
- Grants must be carefully allocated to ensure maximized impact and efficient use of funds.
- Collaboration with the private sector might magnify benefits and cost sharing.
- Ongoing assessment and adjustment of the program are crucial to align with technological advancements.