Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8208

Bill Overview

Title: CLIMB Act of 2022

Description: This bill authorizes the Department of Defense to implement a program to promote early literacy among children whose caregivers are members of the Armed Forces as part of the pediatric primary care of such children.

Sponsors: Rep. Houlahan, Chrissy [D-PA-6]

Target Audience

Population: Children with caregivers in the Armed Forces

Estimated Size: 1200000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Pediatric Nurse (Fort Bragg, North Carolina)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy seems like a great initiative to support early childhood education on base.
  • I'm hopeful it will ease some burdens on families who often move and don't have steady access to consistent educational resources.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Military Officer (San Diego, California)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This will provide much-needed support for my child's education, especially since balancing work and parenthood is tough.
  • Programs like these can really help stabilize a child's learning when they're moving around a lot.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

School Teacher (Fort Hood, Texas)

Age: 39 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think this program could ensure that military kids aren't left behind early in their education.
  • There's a unique set of stresses that these children face, and this initiative addresses a key part of their development.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Logistics Specialist (Offutt AFB, Nebraska)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's promising but I'm cautious; we often move and access to services varies.
  • I hope it means we won't miss out on key developmental support.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 8 5

Civilian Employee on Base (Fort Knox, Kentucky)

Age: 42 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think it's a positive step for families on base, though it doesn't directly affect me.
  • Supporting the troops by supporting their families is always the right call.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Stay-at-home parent (Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I really appreciate this. With my spouse away, having access to educational resources and support makes a world of difference.
  • I hope this becomes a permanent thing and expands over time.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 6

Service Member (Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington)

Age: 27 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's comforting to know that my child might benefit from educational support even when I'm not around.
  • Issues often arise when services vary between postings, so consistency will be key.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Base Educational Consultant (Eglin AFB, Florida)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Any addition to support early literacy is beneficial.
  • However, it will depend on effective administration and resource deployment to truly succeed.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Military Spouse (Kadena AFB, Okinawa, Japan)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Being overseas, accessibility is often a challenge, so this initiative is welcome.
  • Promoting literacy from an early age is crucial given the constant relocations faced by military families.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Family Support Center Employee (Fort Carson, Colorado)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 12.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Providing structured literacy programs can greatly benefit the children of military families.
  • It's about providing stability and quality resources for every child, and this is a good step forward.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $65000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $80000000)

Year 2: $67000000 (Low: $52000000, High: $82000000)

Year 3: $69000000 (Low: $54000000, High: $85000000)

Year 5: $72000000 (Low: $58000000, High: $90000000)

Year 10: $80000000 (Low: $65000000, High: $100000000)

Year 100: $-1 (Low: $-1, High: $-1)

Key Considerations