Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8205

Bill Overview

Title: Defense Access Roads Improvement Act

Description: This bill updates provisions and requirements related to defense access roads, including by requiring the Department of Defense to establish a formal mechanism under which a state, county, or municipality may petition to certify roads as defense access roads.

Sponsors: Rep. Garamendi, John [D-CA-3]

Target Audience

Population: People living in areas with close proximity to military bases or installations worldwide

Estimated Size: 60000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Retail store manager (Fort Bragg, NC)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The traffic congestion has been a real headache, especially during rush hours.
  • Improved roads would make my daily commute much better and save a lot of time.
  • I think better roads would also attract more business to our area.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

Logistics coordinator (San Diego, CA)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The roads can be quite a bottleneck for our transport logistics.
  • Better roads will improve efficiency and reduce my stress about getting things in and out of the base timely.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 6

Local government worker (Anchorage, AK)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Upgrading infrastructure will support our long-term development plans.
  • The community stands to benefit economically from improved access routes, promoting regional growth.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

Retired military (Colorado Springs, CO)

Age: 54 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Currently, accessing base services takes a while due to road conditions.
  • Improved roads would enhance the convenience of accessing veteran services.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Restaurant owner (Killeen, TX)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Better access via improved roads could bring more foot traffic from the base.
  • Economic activity might surge with better infrastructure, benefiting local businesses like mine.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 8 6

College student (Norfolk, VA)

Age: 22 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Better roads would mean easier commutes for both school and work.
  • It can make visits to family working at the base much more frequent and less stressful.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 7

Truck driver (Cheyenne, WY)

Age: 31 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Current road conditions affect my delivery schedule and sometimes my pay too.
  • Better roads would enhance safety and timeliness, directly impacting my work efficiency.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

Retired teacher (Honolulu, HI)

Age: 62 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Our area feels quite connected to the local base, being improved could be good for all.
  • Anything that integrates and uplifts the community is beneficial.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 6

Software engineer (Fort Hood, TX)

Age: 30 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Personally, the roads aren't much of an issue for me, but community growth could benefit.
  • This policy could improve community infrastructure, making the tech industry here more appealing.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 9 9
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 9

Base personnel (Fayetteville, NC)

Age: 27 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • An improvement might shave off a lot of time from my daily commute.
  • Better road conditions are essential for the efficiency of our operational flow.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $50000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $60000000)

Year 2: $51000000 (Low: $41000000, High: $62000000)

Year 3: $52020000 (Low: $41616000, High: $62424000)

Year 5: $53060000 (Low: $42448000, High: $63672000)

Year 10: $55367000 (Low: $44293600, High: $66440400)

Year 100: $100000000 (Low: $80000000, High: $120000000)

Key Considerations