Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8163

Bill Overview

Title: Improving Trauma Systems and Emergency Care Act

Description: This bill reauthorizes through FY2027 and modifies activities of the Department of Health and Human Services related to trauma care. Specific changes include requiring the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response to develop guidance for and otherwise support states (and consortia of states) to coordinate and improve emergency medical services and trauma care during declared emergencies. The bill also expands eligibility for and revises (1) grants for improving emergency medical services and trauma care in rural areas, and (2) competitive grants for improving regional emergency medical and trauma systems.

Sponsors: Rep. O'Halleran, Tom [D-AZ-1]

Target Audience

Population: People who may require emergency medical attention

Estimated Size: 330000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Farmer (Rural Iowa)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I sometimes worry about not getting emergency help quickly due to our remote location.
  • Improved trauma care could mean faster response times for my family and workers.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Construction Worker (Urban Texas)

Age: 58 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think it's great for rural areas, but my access is already pretty good.
  • We could always use more efficiency, though.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Teacher (Suburban Ohio)

Age: 27 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The extra support would be crucial if there's a natural disaster here.
  • It's comforting to know that during emergencies, we'll be better coordinated.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Homemaker (Rural Montana)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • We always hear about help too late, so anything faster is better.
  • In emergencies, every second counts, especially for my elderly parents.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 8 4

Firefighter (Suburban New Jersey)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Anything that improves communication and speeds up response is welcomed.
  • Could assist remote areas in New Jersey during disasters.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Retired (Rural Idaho)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's difficult to manage in emergencies as we can't get immediate care.
  • An updated system might ease my family's worries about my health.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

College Student (Rural Alaska)

Age: 21 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I often fear not getting help quickly if I get hurt out here.
  • Reassured that my community might see better care in emergencies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Paramedic (Urban California)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This should boost our capabilities in large-scale situations.
  • I'm glad that more remote colleagues might get needed support too.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 7

Nurse (Rural Mississippi)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could mean better resources and faster transfers for my patients.
  • Support for rural areas like ours is much needed.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Park Ranger (Rural Vermont)

Age: 42 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Emergency services are crucial when you're so far from everything.
  • We hope to see faster responses when accidents happen due to this policy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $1000000000 (Low: $800000000, High: $1200000000)

Year 2: $1100000000 (Low: $900000000, High: $1300000000)

Year 3: $1150000000 (Low: $950000000, High: $1350000000)

Year 5: $1250000000 (Low: $1050000000, High: $1450000000)

Year 10: $1400000000 (Low: $1200000000, High: $1600000000)

Year 100: $1500000000 (Low: $1300000000, High: $1700000000)

Key Considerations