Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8141

Bill Overview

Title: Warrior Brain Health Act of 2022

Description: This bill requires the Department of Defense (DOD) to establish the Warfighter Brain Health Initiative to unify efforts and programs across DOD to improve the cognitive performance and brain health of members of the Armed Forces. DOD must submit a report to Congress setting forth a strategy and implementation plan to achieve the objectives of the initiative. Additionally, DOD must include a budget justification display for activities relating to the initiative in budget justification materials submitted for FY2025-FY2029.

Sponsors: Rep. Bacon, Don [R-NE-2]

Target Audience

Population: Members of the Armed Forces

Estimated Size: 1300000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Army Officer (Fort Bragg, NC)

Age: 32 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The initiative is crucial for maintaining performance and safety in demanding roles.
  • I believe it will improve not only professional performance but personal mental health.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 9 4

Navy Pilot (San Diego, CA)

Age: 25 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I expect the policy to enhance training by incorporating advanced brain health strategies.
  • The policy should bring long-term career benefits in terms of preparedness and resilience.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

Navy Engineer (Norfolk, VA)

Age: 47 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Enhancing cognitive health is essential, especially for seasoned service members facing stress and mental fatigue.
  • The initiative may help transition skills to civilian life post-service.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 6 3

Pentagon Analyst (Washington D.C.)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Benefits of improving cognitive health may not be immediately felt due to already high personal wellbeing.
  • The broader military culture and structure will likely see improvements.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 9 9
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 8

Army Medic (Fort Hood, TX)

Age: 22 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I expect this initiative to strengthen support systems within the military.
  • Early career personnel might benefit from improved resources and training.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Air Force Intelligence Analyst (Colorado Springs, CO)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Psychological and cognitive support is vital for roles requiring intense focus.
  • The initiative will likely enhance work-life balance strategies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 9 3
Year 20 9 3

Coast Guard Rescue Operator (Miami, FL)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The focus on brain health could improve mission efficiency and safety.
  • Expecting long-term benefits despite immediate operational impacts being limited.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 5

National Guard Member (Seattle, WA)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think this policy is more relevant for active frontline roles than for the National Guard.
  • However, general improvements in cognitive resources will likely be beneficial for disaster response effectiveness.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

Marine Corps Infantryman (Chicago, IL)

Age: 26 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy is essential for combat readiness and personal resilience.
  • Expecting a moderate increase in mental readiness and reduced operational stress.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 8 3
Year 20 7 3

Retired Navy Commander (Hampton Roads, VA)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While personally unaffected in retirement, I see this as a necessary evolution of military health.
  • Improvements will likely have a positive cascading effect on family wellbeing.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $200000000 (Low: $150000000, High: $250000000)

Year 2: $210000000 (Low: $160000000, High: $260000000)

Year 3: $220000000 (Low: $170000000, High: $270000000)

Year 5: $230000000 (Low: $180000000, High: $280000000)

Year 10: $240000000 (Low: $190000000, High: $290000000)

Year 100: $250000000 (Low: $200000000, High: $300000000)

Key Considerations