Bill Overview
Title: Default Proceed Sale Transparency Act
Description: This bill establishes new requirements in the case of a firearm transfer by a licensed dealer, manufacturer, or importer to an unlicensed person prior to the completion of a background check. Current law permits such transactions—default proceed transactions—if a submitted background check remains incomplete after three business days.
Sponsors: Rep. Schneider, Bradley Scott [D-IL-10]
Target Audience
Population: Individuals involved in firearm purchasing transactions worldwide
Estimated Size: 130000000
- The bill affects firearm transactions involving licensed dealers, manufacturers, or importers and unlicensed buyers.
- Firearms are widely used and owned by individuals worldwide, though this bill is primarily relevant to the United States due to its legislative jurisdiction.
- The number of individuals who may be purchasing firearms or affected by firearm policy changes could be significant in any population that has widespread firearm ownership.
Reasoning
- To simulate the impact of the Default Proceed Sale Transparency Act, we need to focus on individuals who might be directly or indirectly affected by firearm transactions in the U.S.
- The budget constraints imply that the policy needs to target effective communication, monitoring, and enforcement initiatives to ensure transparency without exceeding the allocated funds.
- Given that not all American households are involved in firearm transactions, the policy's impact may be limited to a subset of the population, such as frequent gun purchasers, sellers, and affected communities.
- Identify a mix of interviewees who represent different segments within the what's assumed to be a significant population engaging in firearms transactions.
- Consider the varied socio-political views on firearms in the U.S., which might influence personal reception of the policy.
Simulated Interviews
Gun store owner (Texas)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I understand the need for transparency, but it might slow down business operations.
- Clearer guidelines could help us improve our processes though.
- Additional resources for running background checks faster would be appreciated.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Teacher (California)
Age: 30 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I think improving background checks is necessary for safety.
- This could contribute to a safer environment for children.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Retiree (Missouri)
Age: 55 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I worry about my ability to purchase a firearm quickly.
- It might infringe on my rights if not implemented correctly.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 7 |
Tech worker (New York)
Age: 40 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I appreciate the increased safety this policy might offer.
- However, I'm concerned about data privacy and delays.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Police officer (Florida)
Age: 27 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Anything that strengthens background checks is a win for law enforcement.
- I'd like to see these changes paired with funding for community programs.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
IT Specialist (Arkansas)
Age: 38 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 9
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I support transparency but fear overreach.
- This needs to respect rights without unnecessary delays.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 9 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 9 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 9 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 9 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Gun control advocate (Illinois)
Age: 50 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Better regulations can prevent tragedies.
- This policy is a step in the right direction for transparency.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Firearms instructor (Ohio)
Age: 33 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 7.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy should ensure smooth, fair transactions.
- I'm worried about potential business disruptions.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Community activist (Pennsylvania)
Age: 62 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Policies that reduce loopholes in gun sales will benefit us all.
- The community could be safer with these changes.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
Military veteran (Virginia)
Age: 29 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Transparency is good, but don't restrict responsible owners.
- We need precise implementation to avoid harming veterans' access.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $55000000 (Low: $45000000, High: $65000000)
Year 2: $50000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $60000000)
Year 3: $45000000 (Low: $35000000, High: $55000000)
Year 5: $40000000 (Low: $30000000, High: $50000000)
Year 10: $30000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $40000000)
Year 100: $10000000 (Low: $5000000, High: $15000000)
Key Considerations
- Ensuring background check systems are updated and well-funded is crucial.
- Balancing costs with potential safety benefits across communities must be tracked.
- Monitoring the potential behavioral changes in the firearms market will be important for long-term planning.