Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8090

Bill Overview

Title: To reauthorize funding for the Reclamation Climate Change and Water Program.

Description: This bill reauthorizes through FY2033 the Bureau of Reclamation's water cycle, drought, and climate change program, which Reclamation implements through the WaterSMART Basin Study Program. This program is authorized to coordinate with other appropriate agencies to assess global climate change with respect to water resources in the eight major reclamation river basins in the western United States. The program must also ensure watershed and aquifer system strategies are developed to address potential water shortages, conflicts, and other impacts to water.

Sponsors: Rep. Porter, Katie [D-CA-45]

Target Audience

Population: People living in the western United States reliant on the eight major reclamation river basins for water

Estimated Size: 60000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Farmer (Phoenix, Arizona)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The droughts have been tough on my crops, decreasing yield and increasing costs.
  • I'm hopeful this policy would help manage water shortages better.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 9 3
Year 20 9 2

Civil Engineer (Las Vegas, Nevada)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This program is a step in the right direction for sustainable water use in our state.
  • If properly managed, it can greatly improve water availability and urban planning.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 5

Environmental Scientist (Sacramento, California)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's vital we take action now to protect our water resources from climate change.
  • This policy should encourage collaboration across agencies, which I support.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 10 4

Tech Entrepreneur (Denver, Colorado)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy might drive demand for our products, boosting business.
  • I see it as an opportunity to collaborate with agencies working on aquifer strategies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Teacher (Boise, Idaho)

Age: 42 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Educational resources and policy awareness are key for community support.
  • I support anything that can prepare us better for drought situations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 5

Retired (Reno, Nevada)

Age: 65 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I've seen the rivers change over the years; it's frightening.
  • I hope this effort makes a difference for future generations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 9 3

Real Estate Agent (Salt Lake City, Utah)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policies like these impact property values and developments.
  • Water management is increasingly a selling point in urban real estate.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Graduate Student (Los Angeles, California)

Age: 24 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The program provides critical support for developing innovative water policies.
  • I hope the measures are enough to address the growing climate threats.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 8 3
Year 20 9 2

Construction Manager (Tucson, Arizona)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Water is central to our ability to expand housing and commercial space.
  • The effectiveness of policies like these directly affects my industry.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 4

Water Rights Lawyer (Albuquerque, New Mexico)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • My work will be influenced by changes in water policy and management.
  • This initiative could help clarify rights and reduce conflicts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $7500000 (Low: $6000000, High: $9000000)

Year 2: $7500000 (Low: $6000000, High: $9000000)

Year 3: $7500000 (Low: $6000000, High: $9000000)

Year 5: $7500000 (Low: $6000000, High: $9000000)

Year 10: $7500000 (Low: $6000000, High: $9000000)

Year 100: $7500000 (Low: $6000000, High: $9000000)

Key Considerations