Bill Overview
Title: Prioritizing Clean Energy and Climate Cooperation with India Act of 2022
Description: This bill establishes the U.S.-India Climate and Clean Energy Agenda 2030 Partnership and addresses related issues. The partnership shall serve as the primary forum and funding mechanism for U.S.-India cooperation on clean energy technology matters. The Department of State must report to Congress a comprehensive multiyear strategy for implementing the partnership. The bill requires programs to promote U.S.-India partnerships in (1) research and innovation for clean energy technologies, (2) initiatives for providing technical assistance for grid improvement and energy efficiency in India, and (3) initiatives to develop new renewable energy generation capacity in India. The U.S. Agency for International Development must work cooperatively with India's government on integrating scientifically supported climate change risk reduction and building resilience capacities in India. The State Department must report to Congress on the prospects for cooperation between U.S. states and states in India on clean energy issues.
Sponsors: Rep. Peters, Scott H. [D-CA-52]
Target Audience
Population: People in India who may benefit from U.S.-India energy cooperation
Estimated Size: 10000000
- The bill focuses on U.S.-India collaboration, emphasizing the Indian population's direct impact through clean energy access, improved grid efficiency, and renewable capacity in India.
- According to the World Bank, India's population is over 1.4 billion as of 2023, meaning a significant portion could benefit from increased clean energy initiatives.
- The bill facilitates technical and financial cooperation in renewable energy and climate resilience, impacting individuals reliant on current fossil fuel sources in India.
- The clean energy initiatives could also have a positive impact on the global climate, indirectly affecting global citizens by contributing to reduced carbon emissions.
Reasoning
- The policy primarily targets U.S.-India cooperation, thus it directly impacts a small subset of the American population, primarily those involved in clean energy sectors.
- The policy would not directly benefit most American citizens, but those in renewable energy, research, and related sectors might see job creation, increased funding, and expanded international partnerships.
- Indirect benefits could include increased global climate stability due to reduced emissions, potentially benefiting everyone by slowing climate change.
Simulated Interviews
Renewable Energy Analyst (California)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm excited about the potential for more projects and expansion.
- It could create more jobs in our sector, which is always good news.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Engineer (Texas)
Age: 33 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy might open more collaborative projects with India, offering new learning opportunities.
- It could provide job security if more funding is directed to joint projects.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Environmental Lobbyist (New York)
Age: 54 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 8.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy could strengthen international ties and push forward renewable energy policies globally.
- Increased focus on clean energy is always beneficial in combating climate change.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
PhD Student in Environmental Science (Ohio)
Age: 28 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 16/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This could be a great opportunity to study real-world applications of my research.
- Policies like this one are essential for international cooperation on global issues like climate change.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Retired Engineer (Florida)
Age: 60 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 14/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm skeptical about the energy shift, but it's probably necessary for the environment.
- I hope this doesn't hurt the traditional energy sector in the U.S.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 4 |
Policy Maker in Clean Energy (Washington)
Age: 42 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy reinforces the commitment to international cooperation, which is critical.
- I believe this will set a precedent for future collaborations.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
Recent College Graduate (Colorado)
Age: 22 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 18/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This might open doors for new jobs abroad or in international projects.
- It's exciting to see the increased focus on global clean energy efforts.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Climate Scientist (Oregon)
Age: 47 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 11/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Collaboration between the U.S. and India is essential for tackling global climate issues.
- It offers more funding opportunities for important research.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Software Engineer in Renewable Energy company (Illinois)
Age: 30 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 17/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Policies like this enhance our work's impact.
- It's encouraging to see countries come together for a global cause.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Automotive Industry Worker (New Jersey)
Age: 38 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 13/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm worried about how this will affect my job, transitioning can be hard.
- But it's a necessary step towards a cleaner future, which I understand.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 4 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $500000000 (Low: $400000000, High: $600000000)
Year 2: $520000000 (Low: $420000000, High: $630000000)
Year 3: $540000000 (Low: $440000000, High: $650000000)
Year 5: $580000000 (Low: $470000000, High: $700000000)
Year 10: $650000000 (Low: $520000000, High: $780000000)
Year 100: $1000000000 (Low: $800000000, High: $1200000000)
Key Considerations
- This bill strengthens U.S.-India strategic relations.
- Large budgets are necessary to fund research and development in emerging technologies.
- Impact on U.S. renewable industries could be substantial, affecting jobs and trade.
- The focus is on long-term benefits related to climate change mitigation and infrastructure development in India.