Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8055

Bill Overview

Title: Strengthening School Security for Students Act

Description: This bill prohibits a state educational agency (SEA) from receiving federal education funds unless each elementary and secondary school under the jurisdiction of the SEA hires two full-time school resource officers who are licensed to carry a firearm and are trained to prevent student violence for every 500 students in attendance at such school. The bill also rescinds certain unobligated funds provided under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021.

Sponsors: Rep. Garcia, Mike [R-CA-25]

Target Audience

Population: people involved in elementary and secondary education worldwide

Estimated Size: 150000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

School Principal (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having more resource officers could improve safety, but I'm concerned about the cost implications and potential shifts in school environment.
  • Redirecting funds from the American Rescue Plan could affect other crucial programs that we rely on.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 6

Parent (Rural Idaho)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could mean more safety for my kids, but I worry if rural schools can attract qualified officers.
  • It's crucial to balance security with maintaining an inviting and supportive learning environment.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

School Resource Officer (New York City, NY)

Age: 60 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • We already have security measures in place; this helps standardize safety protocols.
  • Training and proactive student engagement are key components to preventing violence.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 8 8

Teacher (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If funds are cut from our classrooms to pay for officers, our teaching ability is compromised.
  • Safety is important, but it shouldn't come at the cost of educational quality.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 4 4

State Educational Agency Official (Chicago, IL)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Implementing this policy would be challenging with current budget constraints.
  • Finding and hiring qualified officers in short time is logistically difficult.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Parent and PTA President (Dallas, TX)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I support measures that ensure safety, but the financial aspects worry me. Could these funds be better allocated to other pressing needs?
  • Community involvement is crucial to ensure these policies work within local contexts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 7 8

High School Teacher (Detroit, MI)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • We've needed this kind of policy for years, but it's crucial it doesn't compromise educational resources.
  • The tension between safety and educational initiatives could be quite significant.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 5

College Student (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 22 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I have mixed feelings; increased security could improve student safety, but may also disrupt school environments.
  • Resources should be allocated based on school-specific needs rather than a blanket policy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 4 4
Year 20 4 4

Retired Educator (Boston, MA)

Age: 62 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policies must consider the holistic development of students rather than focusing narrowly on security.
  • The financial implications might be significant, shifting funds from educational growth initiatives.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

School District Security Advisor (Miami, FL)

Age: 30 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This initiative could lead to positive changes if the community's displaced funds are reallocated effectively and transparently.
  • Regular training and drills will be critical to ensure effectiveness.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $17090000000 (Low: $15000000000, High: $20000000000)

Year 2: $17090000000 (Low: $15000000000, High: $20000000000)

Year 3: $17090000000 (Low: $15000000000, High: $20000000000)

Year 5: $17090000000 (Low: $15000000000, High: $20000000000)

Year 10: $17090000000 (Low: $15000000000, High: $20000000000)

Year 100: $17090000000 (Low: $15000000000, High: $20000000000)

Key Considerations