Bill Overview
Title: American Aerospace Supply Chain Resiliency, Innovation, and Advancement Act of 2022
Description: This bill directs the Department of Transportation to establish an Aerospace Supply Chain Resiliency Task Force to identify and assess risks to the U.S. aerospace supply chain and identify best practices and make recommendations to mitigate such risks. The task force must convene for an initial meeting within 120 days after enactment of the bill and at least every 90 days thereafter. It must also report to Congress on the activities it carries out, including recommendations for regulatory, policy, or legislative action to improve government efforts to reduce barriers, mitigate risk, and bolster the resiliency of the U.S. aerospace supply chain. The task force shall terminate upon submission of the report to Congress.
Sponsors: Rep. Graves, Garret [R-LA-6]
Target Audience
Population: Individuals working in the U.S. aerospace supply chain
Estimated Size: 3000000
- The aerospace supply chain includes manufacturers of aircraft, components, and systems used in aviation and space, as well as the transportation and logistics sectors that support them.
- The U.S. aerospace industry is a significant part of the national economy, employing hundreds of thousands of people directly and indirectly.
- Individuals working in companies that supply parts and components for aerospace manufacturing will be impacted by efforts to make the supply chain more resilient.
- Regulations and policy actions recommended by the task force may lead to changes in operations, affecting employees in procurement, logistics, manufacturing, and technology sectors within aerospace companies.
Reasoning
- The policy primarily impacts the aerospace supply chain, which involves a diverse range of workers, from engineers to logistics personnel.
- There will be a potential ripple effect, not only directly within the aerospace companies but also indirectly affecting related sectors like materials suppliers and transportation.
- Given the bill's focus on resilience and innovation, the immediate effects might concentrate more on strategic planning rather than immediate changes to well-being.
- The initial budget and the projected long-term budget are limited, suggesting that large-scale change might not be immediate or extensive, but the policy could still provide significant direction for future improvements.
Simulated Interviews
Aerospace Engineer (Wichita, Kansas)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 14/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I see this policy as essential for securing the future of our industry.
- It will likely push us to adapt but also protect jobs in the long run.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Supply Chain Manager (Seattle, Washington)
Age: 38 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This initiative could streamline processes and reduce bottlenecks.
- However, some smaller suppliers might struggle to meet new standards.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Logistics Coordinator (Huntsville, Alabama)
Age: 29 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Improving resilience is great, but I'm concerned about the immediate changes required.
- Long-term, it should lead to more stable operations.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Materials Scientist (Dallas, Texas)
Age: 41 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 13/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The focus on tech advancement will drive innovations in materials science.
- There might be initial disruption, but it's a step towards sustainability.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Technical Consultant (Los Angeles, California)
Age: 56 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 1.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Task force recommendations could potentially reinvigorate parts of the industry.
- A focus on best practices is always beneficial if effectively communicated.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Aerospace Machinist (Phoenix, Arizona)
Age: 33 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- If the policy leads to increased orders and job security, it would be beneficial.
- But changes in processes may require additional training.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
CEO of a Small Aerospace Components Supplier (Columbus, Ohio)
Age: 47 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- My business could face new compliance pressures, but it could also lead to growth opportunities if managed well.
- Resilience is key to long-term success.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Aerospace Data Analyst (Denver, Colorado)
Age: 36 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 11/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy might increase my workload, but it will enhance data-driven decision-making.
- It aligns with improving efficiency, which is exciting.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Quality Assurance Inspector (Houston, Texas)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- There may be enhanced quality checks, ensuring better standards across the board.
- This policy although demanding initially, could uplift safety and product consistency.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Aerospace Software Developer (Miami, Florida)
Age: 28 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 16/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I see opportunities for innovation in software development as part of this policy.
- It's an exciting time for tech in aerospace.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $1200000 (Low: $1000000, High: $1500000)
Year 2: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Key Considerations
- The task force's effectiveness will depend on the speed and adoption of its recommendations.
- Inter-agency cooperation and industry stakeholder engagement are critical for success.
- Long-term benefits depend on follow-up actions by Congress and the industry.