Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8046

Bill Overview

Title: César E. Chávez and the Farmworker Movement National Historical Park Act

Description: This bill establishes, as a unit of the National Park System, the César E. Chávez and the Farmworker Movement National Historical Park in California and Arizona. It also establishes the Farmworker Peregrinación National Historic Trail in California. The boundary of the historical park shall include The Forty Acres in Delano, California; the César E. Chávez National Monument, including Nuestra Señora Reina de la Paz, in Keene, California; and the Santa Rita Center in Phoenix, Arizona. The Department of the Interior may acquire land and interests in land that are within the boundary of the park by donation, purchase with donated or appropriated funds, or exchange. The César E. Chávez National Monument shall continue to be administered as a distinct and identifiable unit of the National Park System. Interior may provide public interpretation of historic sites, museums, and resources on land not administered by Interior related to the life of César E. Chávez and the history of the farmworker movement. Interior must prepare a general management plan for the park. The Farmworker Peregrinación National Historic Trail is added to the National Trails System. The federal government shall not acquire for the trail any land or interest in land outside the exterior boundary of any federally managed area without the owner's consent.

Sponsors: Rep. Ruiz, Raul [D-CA-36]

Target Audience

Population: People visiting or living near the César E. Chávez and the Farmworker Movement National Historical Park and trail sites

Estimated Size: 2000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Farmworker (Delano, California)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The recognition of our struggles and history means a lot.
  • It could boost tourism and jobs in our area.
  • Hope this brings more interest to improving farmworkers' conditions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Park Ranger (Fresno, California)

Age: 34 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This is an interesting opportunity for us.
  • I hope it promotes understanding and appreciation of history.
  • There could be overlap in duties managing these parks.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Historian (San Diego, California)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Finally, more recognition for this crucial history.
  • Hope it'll lead to more resources for education and research.
  • Studying this subject will now be more exciting.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 6

Museum Curator (Keene, California)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Excited about increased funding and resources.
  • We'll have more visitors and educational opportunities.
  • This could mandate some significant changes in guard structures.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

Small Business Owner (Phoenix, Arizona)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think more tourists could help my business.
  • Curious to see if this really happens.
  • Concerned about increased costs or competition.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

College Student (San Francisco, California)

Age: 21 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This adds to my motivation to engage with Hispanic heritage.
  • Would be great to have a field trip related to my studies.
  • Curious to see how this could impact future studies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 5

Retired (Phoenix, Arizona)

Age: 63 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This is a crucial recognition of our lives' work.
  • Hope it brings our stories to a wider audience.
  • Concerned about how the changes will impact our community.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Tourism Director (Phoenix, Arizona)

Age: 47 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This could mean a big increase in our tourist numbers.
  • Planning is key, we must be ready.
  • Hope it brings sustainable development and benefits.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

Graduate Student (Los Angeles, California)

Age: 25 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's fascinating to study the implementation of such policies.
  • Hope to see tangible impacts over my academic career.
  • This could be a case study in policy benefits.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Social Worker (Phoenix, Arizona)

Age: 31 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This can lead to more resources for our communities.
  • Excited to see cultural pride increasing among young people.
  • Worried about possible displacement or gentrification.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $7200000 (Low: $6000000, High: $10000000)

Year 2: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $8000000)

Year 3: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $8000000)

Year 5: $5200000 (Low: $4200000, High: $8200000)

Year 10: $5500000 (Low: $4500000, High: $8500000)

Year 100: $11000000 (Low: $9000000, High: $15000000)

Key Considerations