Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7977

Bill Overview

Title: Promoting Opportunities for Non-Traditional Capital Formation Act

Description: This bill expands the functions of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Office of the Advocate for Small Business Capital Formation. Specifically, the office must (1) provide educational resources and host events to promote capital-raising options for underrepresented small businesses and businesses in rural areas, and (2) meet annually with representatives of state securities commissions to discuss opportunities for collaboration and coordination.

Sponsors: Rep. Waters, Maxine [D-CA-43]

Target Audience

Population: Underrepresented small business owners and businesses in rural areas

Estimated Size: 3500000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Small business owner (Tuscaloosa, Alabama)

Age: 35 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think this policy could be a game-changer for my business.
  • Educational resources will help me understand capital options better.
  • I hope it targets tech startups in rural areas like mine.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Farm owner (Fresno, California)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think more access to financial resources would greatly improve my business.
  • I'd like more information on how to access these resources.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 9 5

Consultant for small businesses (Dover, Delaware)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is likely to relieve some struggles my clients face.
  • Educational events could enhance understanding and negotiation with investors.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Freelance artist (Rochester, New York)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I would appreciate more knowledge on accessing capital.
  • This policy might help me and others like me find investors.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Retired entrepreneur (Mansfield, Ohio)

Age: 65 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see this as a positive step for new entrepreneurs.
  • I hope to see mentorship programs as part of this initiative.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Nonprofit director (Flagstaff, Arizona)

Age: 48 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy could seriously benefit the indigenous communities I work with.
  • Rural-focused events will encourage more locals to get involved.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Retail store owner (Miami, Florida)

Age: 37 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I am hopeful this policy will improve my chances to secure business loans.
  • Looking forward to more inclusive financial education.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 5

Restaurant owner (Portland, Oregon)

Age: 58 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see huge benefits if the policy includes more eco-focus and financial backing.
  • Expansion plans need accessible funding.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Agricultural consultant (Bismarck, North Dakota)

Age: 39 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • More capital will help farmers implement sustainable practices.
  • Excited about potential collaboration between states.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Tech entrepreneur (Columbus, Ohio)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I imagine this policy attracting more investors to tech startups.
  • Access to resources can level the playing field.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $3500000 (Low: $3000000, High: $4000000)

Year 2: $3600000 (Low: $3100000, High: $4100000)

Year 3: $3700000 (Low: $3200000, High: $4200000)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations