Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7974

Bill Overview

Title: Endometriosis CARE Act of 2022

Description: This bill requires the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to address endometriosis through increasing awareness, research, and other means. Endometriosis is a condition in which tissue similar to the inner lining of the uterus grows outside of the uterus, which may result in pain, infertility, and other symptoms. Specifically, HHS must report on barriers (e.g., issues related to health insurance coverage and costs) to accessing endometriosis care and treatments; disseminate information about endometriosis, such as its symptoms and treatments, to both the public and health care providers; and seek to contract with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to study racial, ethnic, and other disparities in endometriosis prevalence, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. The National Institutes of Health must also conduct or support data collection, surveillance, and research related to endometriosis.

Sponsors: Rep. Underwood, Lauren [D-IL-14]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals affected by endometriosis

Estimated Size: 7000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Software Engineer (New York City)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Any increase in awareness and research funding is welcome as it can improve my quality of life.
  • Better insurance coverage would relieve financial stress,

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 3
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 5 2

Actress (Los Angeles)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Stronger policies could really make a difference in making treatments more affordable.
  • Increased research can potentially lead to better treatment options in the future.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 3
Year 2 6 3
Year 3 7 3
Year 5 8 2
Year 10 7 2
Year 20 6 2

College Student (Miami)

Age: 21 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Raising awareness is important so more people can understand what I'm dealing with.
  • I hope for better education in schools about these kinds of health issues.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

Teacher (Chicago)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm hopeful that more research will provide alternative treatments.
  • Education on the condition is desperately needed in rural areas.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Trans man, Project Manager (Denver)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm glad to see policies that recognize the needs of trans people in health care.
  • There's hope for better support systems.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 3

Self-Employed (Phoenix)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Public access to more information would be helpful for people unaware of post-menopause symptoms.
  • I hope future policies consider wider age ranges.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 4 3

Barista (Seattle)

Age: 23 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This could mean finally having supportive healthcare providers.
  • I hope this helps non-binary people feel included in healthcare discussions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 3
Year 5 8 3
Year 10 7 2
Year 20 6 2

Nurse (Boston)

Age: 36 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think this will improve patient's trust in our system.
  • Full coverage for medications would be amazing.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 4

Stay-at-home Parent (Austin)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This could really change how we talk about women's health in society.
  • We need more community support programs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 7 3
Year 20 6 3

Scientist (San Francisco)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe this policy is a step in the right direction for research funding.
  • Community involvement is key to effective policy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $50000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $60000000)

Year 2: $52000000 (Low: $42000000, High: $62000000)

Year 3: $54000000 (Low: $44000000, High: $64000000)

Year 5: $57000000 (Low: $47000000, High: $67000000)

Year 10: $60000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $70000000)

Year 100: $60000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $70000000)

Key Considerations