Bill Overview
Title: NO VOTE for Noncitizens Act of 2022
Description: This bill establishes additional requirements related to noncitizens and voting and addresses related issues. Among other provisions, this bill (1) requires states to make reasonable efforts to remove noncitizens from the official eligible voter lists, (2) requires states to coordinate official registered voter lists with court records of individuals who have been recused from jury duty on the grounds that they are noncitizens, and (3) reduces election assistance to states and local jurisdictions that allow noncitizens to vote.
Sponsors: Rep. Davis, Rodney [R-IL-13]
Target Audience
Population: Noncitizens worldwide
Estimated Size: 22000000
- The bill focuses on noncitizens, specifically those residing in the United States who may currently be on voting lists.
- Noncitizens in the U.S. are impacted as they may be removed from voter registration lists if it is determined they are not eligible.
- There are many noncitizens residing in the U.S., including lawful permanent residents (green card holders), people on various visas, and undocumented immigrants. The total number of noncitizens is significant, given the millions of immigrants residing in the U.S.
Reasoning
- Consideration has been made for a diverse range of people affected by the policy, both directly and indirectly.
- This policy largely affects noncitizens, but it is implemented through state and local election processes, which also impacts citizens who interact with these systems.
- Budgetary restrictions and population size have been taken into account to simulate a realistic small-scale impact test.
Simulated Interviews
Graduate Student (New York, NY)
Age: 35 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I understand the importance of securing elections, but it seems like this policy might discourage noncitizens from feeling welcome or taking part in community activities.
- The current political climate already feels divisive; policies like this could exacerbate feelings of being unwelcome.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 8 |
Restaurant Owner (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 42 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I have been living here for over 10 years and contribute to the economy. It feels unfair that policies like this are being introduced as if we are a problem to be sorted out.
- Voting at a local level for school boards or city councils should be encouraged, not punished.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 9 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 10 |
Software Developer (Miami, FL)
Age: 28 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm not too concerned about this policy as I was not planning to vote and my status is clearly documented, but I see the potential for bureaucratic issues.
- Policies that historically have targeted immigrants make us uneasy, even if not directly impacting us.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 9 |
Construction Worker (Houston, TX)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 1.0 years
Commonness: 11/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I don't engage in voting or politics due to my status, and policies like this ensure I won't even consider engaging civically.
- Fears among my community could increase even if this doesn't directly impact us.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Retired (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 67 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 16/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I see this policy as a necessary step to secure our elections, though I hope it's implemented fairly and doesn't discriminate wrongly.
- It's crucial that in applying such laws, we don't inadvertently harm our community spirit or stigmatize those legally living here.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 10 |
High School Teacher (Chicago, IL)
Age: 30 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 6.0 years
Commonness: 14/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I appreciate being here as a legal resident, but policies targeting noncitizens can sometimes make us feel excluded and anxious about our statuses.
- Feeling estranged from local civic duties can have a communal impact that's hard to measure.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 9 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 9 |
College Student (Seattle, WA)
Age: 22 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This legislation seems more like a policy formality that won't affect my day-to-day life directly.
- However, the broader implications of how noncitizens are perceived and treated worries me.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 8 |
Nurse (Phoenix, AZ)
Age: 48 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 18/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This measure could be beneficial in ensuring the integrity of our elections, but I worry about my patients who are new immigrants feeling more isolated.
- I hope the policy approach remains fair and considerate of all residents.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 9 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 9 |
Factory Worker (Detroit, MI)
Age: 60 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 9
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 17/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Having become a citizen, I value my voting rights highly, and such policies make me fear about misunderstanding or errors that could circulate around noncitizens.
- Efforts should focus on making the system efficient, but not at the expense of creating fear or hostility.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 5 | 10 | 10 |
| Year 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Year 20 | 10 | 10 |
Freelancer (Atlanta, GA)
Age: 24 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 13/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Even though I can't vote, knowing that more policies that disenfranchise noncitizens can reduce chances for future legislation that might welcome us more doesn't sit right.
- Policies making some feel lesser or excluded harms everyone's societal health.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 9 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)
Year 2: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)
Year 3: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)
Year 5: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)
Year 10: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)
Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Key Considerations
- The balance between costs and savings is dependent on how effectively states implement the required changes.
- States and local jurisdictions with better existing systems might experience lower costs.
- Anticipated legal challenges could delay or increase costs.