Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7934

Bill Overview

Title: Las Americas Energy Security Act

Description: This bill establishes a sovereign lending program for eligible Latin American and Caribbean partner countries to support such countries' short-term energy needs and fund projects to transition to renewable energy. The bill also directs the Department of State to prioritize and expedite U.S. government support for such countries' efforts to increase energy security, including by providing support for projects that improve Latin American and Caribbean energy markets.

Sponsors: Rep. Espaillat, Adriano [D-NY-13]

Target Audience

Population: People in Latin American and Caribbean countries

Estimated Size: 0

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Renewable Energy Analyst (Houston, Texas)

Age: 35 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe this policy will likely create new opportunities for cross-border projects in the energy sector.
  • Supporting Latin America's transition to renewables could spur innovation and business for U.S. companies like mine.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 8

International Trade Specialist (Los Angeles, California)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm optimistic about the potential for improved trade relations with Latin America.
  • Expanding energy markets could lead to better economic ties with these countries.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 6

Environmental Activist (Miami, Florida)

Age: 28 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm supportive of any policy that aligns the U.S. with renewable initiatives.
  • This is a step towards international cooperation on climate issues I deeply care about.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 10 4

Taxpayer and Business Owner (Chicago, Illinois)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm skeptical about spending taxpayer money on overseas projects unless there's a clear benefit to the U.S.
  • I find it hard to see how this impacts my business directly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Retired Energy Consultant (Boston, Massachusetts)

Age: 62 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This initiative could enhance the U.S.'s strategic position in Latin America through energy alliances.
  • I'm retired but stay informed about these developments as they impact the global energy sector.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 5

Financial Analyst (New York, New York)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If this policy stabilizes energy markets, it could bring long-term benefits for investments.
  • Given the policy's focus on renewables, there is potential for growth in green finance areas.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Software Engineer (San Francisco, California)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Technology plays a crucial role in renewable energy transitions, and this policy could advance those technologies.
  • I see the potential for future job markets in areas related to energy technology.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Educator (Phoenix, Arizona)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Educating students about such policies can highlight the importance of renewable energy.
  • The policy fosters collaboration which is an important lesson for future generations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Government Official (Washington, D.C.)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy reinforces strategic alliances and increases energy security for the U.S. through diplomatic channels.
  • It's a step forward for sustainable development, which aligns with our environmental goals.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 10 8

University Student (Austin, Texas)

Age: 25 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm learning about the geopolitical implications of energy policies, and this policy seems to be a strategic move.
  • It's encouraging to see energy transitions being prioritized globally.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $300000000 (Low: $250000000, High: $350000000)

Year 2: $300000000 (Low: $250000000, High: $350000000)

Year 3: $300000000 (Low: $250000000, High: $350000000)

Year 5: $300000000 (Low: $250000000, High: $350000000)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations