Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7923

Bill Overview

Title: Investor Justice Act of 2022

Description: This bill establishes grants for investor advocacy clinics. To qualify, clinics associated with a law school or a tax-exempt organization must provide free legal representation to investors with securities arbitration and mediation claims pending before a registered national securities association.

Sponsors: Rep. Quigley, Mike [D-IL-5]

Target Audience

Population: Investors involved in securities arbitration and mediation claims

Estimated Size: 350000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Marketing Manager (New York, NY)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I was anxious about handling the arbitration without proper legal support.
  • With this policy, I can reach out to a clinic for assistance without worrying about the cost.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 3

Software Engineer (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 32 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think it's great that there are resources available to help with the mediation process.
  • Having access to legal help will definitely ease some of the stress involved.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 6
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 4

Graduate Student (Austin, TX)

Age: 29 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • My budget is tight as a student, so I really appreciate the opportunity to get legal help at no cost.
  • This support will help me focus better on my studies while dealing with the arbitration.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 8 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 5 3
Year 20 5 3

Teacher (Miami, FL)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm not very familiar with legal proceedings, so this policy provides a necessary safety net.
  • I hope to resolve my case quickly with proper legal representation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 6 3

Retired (Chicago, IL)

Age: 64 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's been difficult handling legal issues on a fixed income.
  • I'm relieved at the possibility of finding free legal support to settle this dispute.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 4
Year 2 7 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 6 3
Year 10 5 3
Year 20 5 2

Data Analyst (Seattle, WA)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I didn't expect to end up in a legal dispute over my investments.
  • Having a dedicated resource I can turn to for help is reassuring.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 5 3
Year 20 4 3

Entry-level Accountant (Boston, MA)

Age: 23 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm new to investing and didn't expect these issues to arise so early.
  • Access to legal help prevents me from feeling overwhelmed by the process.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 5 4

Real Estate Agent (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I manage most of my finances, but handling a dispute is challenging without specialist advice.
  • I'm glad the policy could potentially help clarify and resolve these issues.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 6 3

Small Business Owner (Denver, CO)

Age: 61 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Managing a business is hard enough without financial disputes.
  • Having access to free legal clinics could significantly reduce the stress of resolving this.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 6 3
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 5 2

Freelance Writer (Portland, OR)

Age: 48 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As a freelancer, I can't afford large legal expenses.
  • It's a relief to know that I can find legal assistance without worrying about the bills.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 6
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 3

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $50000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $60000000)

Year 2: $52000000 (Low: $42000000, High: $62000000)

Year 3: $54000000 (Low: $43000000, High: $65000000)

Year 5: $58000000 (Low: $45000000, High: $68000000)

Year 10: $70000000 (Low: $55000000, High: $85000000)

Year 100: $120000000 (Low: $90000000, High: $150000000)

Key Considerations