Bill Overview
Title: To establish a civil action for disqualification under section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, and for other purposes.
Description: This bill establishes a civil action through which an individual may be disqualified from holding office under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. This includes an individual who has engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States or has given aid or comfort to the enemies of the United States.
Sponsors: Rep. Wasserman Schultz, Debbie [D-FL-23]
Target Audience
Population: Individuals who have engaged in insurrection, rebellion, or supported enemies of the U.S.
Estimated Size: 2000
- The bill specifically targets individuals who have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States.
- The population of individuals who have given aid or comfort to the enemies of the United States will also be impacted.
- The global population potentially impacted includes any individual involved in acts considered as insurrection or rebellion globally that may have connections to the United States.
Reasoning
- The primary population directly impacted by this policy includes individuals who have engaged in acts considered insurrection or rebellion against the United States, as well as those who have given aid or comfort to its enemies.
- Given the legal and political nature of this policy, the average citizen or those not involved in such activities will not be significantly affected on a personal level.
- The estimated target population size is quite small relative to the entire U.S. population, reducing the average cost for implementation per individual.
- With the given budget constraints, the policy needs to focus on legal proceedings and potentially enforcement to ensure compliance, suggesting a limited reach but high legal intensity.
- Individuals merely accused but not convicted would not see an impact unless further engaged by legal actions.
- Historically and politically, the policy could alter the landscape of who can rightfully assume office, thus indirectly affecting broader political dynamics.
Simulated Interviews
Political Analyst (Washington D.C.)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy seems like an essential measure to maintain the integrity of our democratic institutions.
- I believe it might not have a significant impact on my personal life but is crucial for national stability.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
History Professor (Atlanta, GA)
Age: 60 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's imperative to learn from history and prevent individuals with such ideologies from holding power in the U.S.
- The policy appears necessary but might lead to significant political debates.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Software Developer (Raleigh, NC)
Age: 35 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 16/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I support the initiative but worry about potential misuse of disqualification against opposing political figures.
- Keeping office holders accountable is crucial to democracy.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Retired Military Officer (Houston, TX)
Age: 50 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy upholds the security and democratic values of the U.S.
- People who have acted against the nation should not be in positions of power.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Civil Rights Lawyer (New York, NY)
Age: 30 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 14/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy could be vital for preventing harmful individuals from gaining power, but it must be applied fairly to avoid targeting dissidents unjustly.
- Ensuring justice and fairness in implementation will be challenging.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Federal Judge (Chicago, IL)
Age: 40 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Enforcing this policy will be complex and require stringent evidence for disqualification.
- Ensuring clarity in what constitutes aid to enemies is important to prevent abuse.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Media Executive (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 55 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 13/20
Statement of Opinion:
- While it might not directly affect my industry, the political implications could shift media narratives significantly.
- It's a delicate balance to ensure media remains unbiased with respect to the proceedings following this policy.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Activist (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 26 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Ensuring electoral integrity is paramount, and this policy appears to align with those values.
- There is potential for the misuse of such legislation against vocal opponents, which must be watched closely.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Political Consultant (Phoenix, AZ)
Age: 52 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 4.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy increases trust in governance by disqualifying those with dangerous intentions.
- However, due diligence is needed to prevent it as a tool for politically motivated exclusions.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Retired Politician (Portland, OR)
Age: 63 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Reflecting upon my experiences, such a policy could prevent national security risks but must be weighed against constitutional rights of individuals.
- This action can greatly influence political landscapes if not handled with caution.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 9 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $25000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $40000000)
Year 2: $25250000 (Low: $15150000, High: $40400000)
Year 3: $25502500 (Low: $15301500, High: $40804000)
Year 5: $26012606 (Low: $15607679, High: $41616160)
Year 10: $27374156 (Low: $16453964, High: $43897928)
Year 100: $69257413 (Low: $41647965, High: $111275661)
Key Considerations
- The cost estimates include potential administrative costs related to the judicial process.
- There may be legal challenges that could impact the cost and effectiveness of the bill.
- The target population size is relatively small, limiting broad economic impacts.