Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7854

Bill Overview

Title: Venezuelan Adjustment Act

Description: This bill requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to grant lawful permanent resident status to qualifying nationals of Venezuela. A national of Venezuela shall be eligible if that individual (1) applies for lawful permanent resident status no later than three years after this bill's enactment, (2) entered the United States on or before December 31, 2021, (3) has been continuously physically present in the United States for at least one year when filing their application, (4) is otherwise eligible to receive an immigrant visa, and (5) is not inadmissible under various grounds such as a conviction for an aggravated felony. Certain grounds for inadmissibility, such as the public charge ground, shall not apply. The spouse, child, or unmarried son or daughter of an eligible individual shall also be eligible. If an individual has applied for lawful permanent resident status under this bill and is subject to exclusion, deportation, or removal proceedings, DHS may not order that individual's removal unless DHS has made a final determination to deny the application. DHS must provide work authorization to an individual whose application has been pending for more than 180 days, and may also provide authorization before that.

Sponsors: Rep. Soto, Darren [D-FL-9]

Target Audience

Population: Nationals of Venezuela currently residing in the United States

Estimated Size: 150000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Nurse (Miami, FL)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I am hopeful that this policy will provide us with permanent status, which will make life a lot more stable for our family.
  • Currently, I'm anxious about the future, but this policy could ease a lot of our worries.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 4

Software Developer (Arlington, VA)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Acquiring permanent residency would enhance my career possibilities significantly.
  • While I'm currently stable, having residency would secure my future in the US.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 6

Construction Worker (Brooklyn, NY)

Age: 42 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Permanency means my kids will have a future here without fear of being uprooted.
  • It's important for us to earn legally and contribute openly to society.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 4
Year 2 7 4
Year 3 8 4
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 9 3
Year 20 9 3

Small Business Owner (Houston, TX)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This act will allow me to expand my business without fear of sudden deportation.
  • Stability is crucial for planning and investment in my business.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 8 3

Student (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 25 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The adjustment act would remove barriers to internships and career opportunities post-graduation.
  • Worrying about visa status is an ongoing stress.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 9 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 5

Hospitality Worker (Orlando, FL)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having permanent residency would mean job security and the ability to plan for the future.
  • Every renewal period comes with uncertainty and fear.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 5
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 9 5
Year 5 9 4
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 9 3

Engineer (Houston, TX)

Age: 44 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy simplifies things for my family and I.
  • I'm already living quite comfortably thanks to my job, but legal permanence would be reassuring.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 5

Retired (Jacksonville, FL)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I worry about my ability to remain close to my family without resident status.
  • Having stability in my retirement years is my biggest concern.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 4
Year 2 7 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 8 3
Year 10 8 3
Year 20 7 2

Chef (New York, NY)

Age: 32 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Being officially accepted and recognized here would allow me to advance professionally.
  • Each day is a question mark without proper documentation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 9 4
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 9 3

Freelance Journalist (Dallas, TX)

Age: 27 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Permanent residency would enable me to work freely and explore different career paths without fear.
  • Right now, I'm limited in my ability to accept certain jobs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $350000000 (Low: $250000000, High: $450000000)

Year 2: $300000000 (Low: $225000000, High: $375000000)

Year 3: $275000000 (Low: $200000000, High: $350000000)

Year 5: $200000000 (Low: $150000000, High: $250000000)

Year 10: $100000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $150000000)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations