Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7850

Bill Overview

Title: Prevent BLEEDing Act of 2022

Description: This bill establishes grants to make available anti-blood loss supplies (e.g., tourniquets, wound-packing materials, and gloves) in high-traffic and other specified areas for use in medical emergencies. The Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response within the Department of Health and Human Services must award the grants to state, tribal, and local governments. Additionally, the Government Accountability Office must study trends in accessing bleeding control kits and training in their use.

Sponsors: Rep. O'Halleran, Tom [D-AZ-1]

Target Audience

Population: People in high-traffic areas who may experience medical emergencies involving blood loss

Estimated Size: 150000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Transit Worker (New York City)

Age: 35 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see a lot of accidents on the subway, and having more bleeding control kits could really help.
  • I think more people should be trained to use them, though, so the kits don't just sit unused.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Teacher (Chicago)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm worried about school shootings and other emergencies.
  • These kits might help us react better if something happens.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Sports Event Manager (Los Angeles)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • We get massive crowds at games, and having these kits might make everyone feel a bit safer.
  • A well-placed kit can be the difference between life and death during events.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Paramedic (Atlanta)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think it's a great initiative, but people need to be trained properly.
  • Sometimes bystanders are the first to arrive, and having this equipment could really help.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Retiree (Phoenix)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don't expect this to affect me directly, but it's good to have emergency plans in place.
  • Seems more relevant for people who spend more time in crowded spots.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Retail Worker (San Francisco)

Age: 25 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I've witnessed a few medical emergencies while working, and it was scary.
  • Having these kits might make me and my coworkers feel a bit more secure.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Corporate Lawyer (Boston)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Generally, I feel safe on my daily commute.
  • These kits could provide some peace of mind, but I haven't thought much about it.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Nurse (Houston)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's always good to have more life-saving resources.
  • Training the public how to use these kits will be crucial.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Software Developer (Seattle)

Age: 32 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As I don't go out too much, I don't think it will affect me much directly.
  • However, it's a responsible measure for public spaces.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

College Student (Miami)

Age: 23 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having these kits around campus could ease some worries about emergencies.
  • I hope there's also a push for students to learn how to use them.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $100000000 (Low: $85000000, High: $120000000)

Year 2: $90000000 (Low: $75000000, High: $110000000)

Year 3: $80000000 (Low: $70000000, High: $100000000)

Year 5: $75000000 (Low: $65000000, High: $90000000)

Year 10: $50000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $70000000)

Year 100: $30000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $60000000)

Key Considerations