Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7825

Bill Overview

Title: No Funding for Sanctuary Campuses Act

Description: This bill makes an institution of higher education (IHE) that is a sanctuary campus ineligible for federal student-aid funds. In general, a sanctuary campus is an IHE that has a policy of restricting its personnel from cooperating with federal officials in enforcing the immigration laws or that harbors or provides educational benefits to aliens who lack a lawful immigration status. The Department of Homeland Security must transmit to the Department of Education and publish in the Federal Register notice of a determination that an IHE is a sanctuary campus.

Sponsors: Rep. Murphy, Gregory [R-NC-3]

Target Audience

Population: Students at sanctuary campuses reliant on US federal student-aid

Estimated Size: 200000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Undergraduate student (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 20 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy feels like a punishment to students who need financial aid the most.
  • I am worried about continuing my education without the federal aid I rely on.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 7
Year 2 5 7
Year 3 6 7
Year 5 7 8
Year 10 8 9
Year 20 8 9

Assistant Professor (Austin, TX)

Age: 33 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This could heavily impact our research funding and limit resources for students.
  • The loss of federal aid might force us to adjust enrollment strategies and admission offers.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 8
Year 2 7 8
Year 3 7 9
Year 5 8 9
Year 10 8 9
Year 20 8 9

Graduate student (New York, NY)

Age: 26 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The uncertainty about funding is stressful and distracting from my studies.
  • I may need to take on more work or consider alternative study arrangements.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 7
Year 5 7 8
Year 10 8 9
Year 20 8 9

College Administrator (Chicago, IL)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could drastically alter our student financial aid offerings and retention rates.
  • We will need to communicate effectively with affected students and seek alternative funding sources.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 6 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 8
Year 10 7 8
Year 20 8 9

Prospective student (Miami, FL)

Age: 18 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • My decision hinges on available financial aid. Losing this option limits my college choices.
  • I need to evaluate other institutions with clear financial aid policies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 7
Year 2 5 7
Year 3 6 7
Year 5 7 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 9

Community Organizer (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy undermines the efforts to support undocumented students and their allies.
  • It creates a chilling effect on campuses striving for inclusive policies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 6 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 9

University Chancellor (Cambridge, MA)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Balancing the university's mission with fiscal reality will be challenging.
  • We will lobby for alternative funding and strategize to uphold our sanctuary status.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 8
Year 2 7 8
Year 3 8 9
Year 5 8 9
Year 10 8 9
Year 20 9 9

High School Counselor (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I am worried about advising students if federal aid becomes uncertain at sanctuary campuses.
  • It's critical that students explore all financial aid options thoroughly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 8
Year 2 7 8
Year 3 7 8
Year 5 8 9
Year 10 8 9
Year 20 9 9

Technical Support Specialist (Seattle, WA)

Age: 22 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Without aid, I may not be able to afford my classes.
  • I am anxious about my future education prospects.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 7
Year 2 5 7
Year 3 6 7
Year 5 6 8
Year 10 7 8
Year 20 8 8

Retired Educator (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 17/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policies like these erode the trust and progress made in inclusive education.
  • Funding challenges will impact our ability to fundraise effectively for scholarships.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 9
Year 2 8 9
Year 3 8 9
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 9

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $30000000)

Year 2: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $30000000)

Year 3: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $30000000)

Year 5: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $30000000)

Year 10: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $30000000)

Year 100: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $30000000)

Key Considerations