Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7821

Bill Overview

Title: DHS Transnational Criminal Investigative Units Supplemental Pay Act

Description: This bill authorizes U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to provide stipends to vetted foreign members of transnational criminal investigative units.

Sponsors: Rep. Garbarino, Andrew R. [R-NY-2]

Target Audience

Population: Foreign members of transnational criminal investigative units

Estimated Size: 0

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Policy Analyst (Washington D.C.)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think the policy will be beneficial for enhancing U.S. safety indirectly through better-enforced laws.
  • It is unlikely to impact my personal finances or wellbeing directly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

International Business Consultant (New York, NY)

Age: 34 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Such policies can streamline compliance issues and allow smoother international operations for businesses.
  • Direct impact on my wellbeing is minimal, but could indirectly ease some regulatory challenges.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Police Officer (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Closer collaboration with international counterparts could enhance our local law enforcement tactics.
  • I don't see a direct impact on my daily life, but there might be long-term safety benefits.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Software Developer (Chicago, IL)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see these policies as necessary for global security improvement, but they don't directly affect my personal life.
  • It's interesting to see investment in international law enforcement.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Retired, former Homeland Security Officer (San Diego, CA)

Age: 62 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • These policies will help former colleagues get necessary resources.
  • I benefit from knowing they'll have the support to address transnational crimes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Small Business Owner (Dallas, TX)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While this policy isn't directly relevant to my business, international stability could contribute to economic stability.
  • Unclear how much impact it will have on small businesses like mine.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Freelance Journalist (Miami, FL)

Age: 41 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increased funding for international units is a positive step towards global safety.
  • My work might benefit from increased information availability and transparency.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

University Professor (Seattle, WA)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This aligns with the strategic objectives of international law enforcement cooperation.
  • Impacts my teaching curriculum, but not directly my personal wellbeing.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Non-Profit Worker (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 30 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Indirectly supports efforts to stabilize regions which might need less relief aid in the future.
  • It's good for general safety, but no direct effects on my work.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Cybersecurity Analyst (Austin, TX)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • International security measures might reduce cyber threats against global networks.
  • No personal impact expected, but professional processes might see indirect improvements.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $25000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $35000000)

Year 2: $25000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $35000000)

Year 3: $25000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $35000000)

Year 5: $25000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $35000000)

Year 10: $25000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $35000000)

Year 100: $25000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $35000000)

Key Considerations