Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7817

Bill Overview

Title: Multilateral Aid Review Act of 2022

Description: This bill establishes a U.S. Multilateral Aid Review to assess U.S. government investments in multilateral entities. The President must establish a U.S. Multilateral Aid Review Task Force, which must periodically report to Congress the review's findings. The task force must establish and report the methodology for the reviews, which must include assessments of (1) the relationship between such multilateral entities' stated goals and actual results, (2) the management practices and transparency of the entities, (3) the alignment between an entity's policies and practices with U.S. foreign policy objectives, and (4) whether U.S. goals may be better served by pursing a bilateral approach. The bill establishes a U.S. Multilateral Aid Review Peer Review Group, which must review the reports and provide feedback to the task force and to Congress.

Sponsors: Rep. Buck, Ken [R-CO-4]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals worldwide benefiting from U.S. multilateral aid programs

Estimated Size: 329500000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

High School Teacher (Columbus, Ohio)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think it's good for the U.S. to review where our aid money is going. It makes sure it's used effectively. Education on global issues is crucial, and if this leads to better global projects, I'm all for it.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

Software Developer (Seattle, Washington)

Age: 37 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Efficient use of aid is important. If this review leads to smarter decisions, I support it. As long as no vital aid gets cut without a good reason just to save money.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Non-profit Worker (New York, New York)

Age: 29 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm worried that more bureaucracy means cuts. These reviews must be thorough but fair, supporting programs that truly work and benefiting countries in need.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Retired Military (Austin, Texas)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • A strong global presence is vital for national security. If this helps align aid with our interests, it's positive.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Healthcare Administrator (Nashville, Tennessee)

Age: 62 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Healthcare globally affects us too. This review should ensure funds improve global health, indirectly supporting our healthcare efforts as well.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Graduate Student (Los Angeles, California)

Age: 24 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see potential for this to improve information we have about multilateral efforts, assisting my research and understanding of international dynamics.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Retired Nurse (Chicago, Illinois)

Age: 71 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I hope this means better use of our taxes. Helping others globally often comes back to benefit us in unforeseen ways.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Environmental Scientist (Miami, Florida)

Age: 48 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Any review helping align environments' multilateral efforts with sensible U.S. contributions could be tremendously positive globally.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 10 8
Year 10 10 8
Year 20 9 8

Journalist (Denver, Colorado)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The findings of such reviews can influence public opinion and policy development, providing critical data for those reporting on these issues.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Small Business Owner (Portland, Oregon)

Age: 52 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Stability globally can influence markets here. Makes sense to review and ensure aid supports stable global trade.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $25000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $30000000)

Year 2: $25000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $30000000)

Year 3: $25000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $30000000)

Year 5: $25000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $30000000)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations