Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7809

Bill Overview

Title: Communities Deserve Cops Act

Description: This bill allows funds under the Community Oriented Policing Services grant program to be used to provide signing bonuses and retention bonuses for law enforcement officers.

Sponsors: Rep. Rutherford, John H. [R-FL-4]

Target Audience

Population: People in communities impacted by police presence and community policing programs worldwide

Estimated Size: 331000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

School Teacher (St. Louis, MO)

Age: 33 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As a teacher, I often worry about the safety of my students, especially with the recent incidents in our neighborhood. If more officers are on the streets, maybe it would deter crime.
  • I hope better motivation for officers means they'll also engage more positively with the community, but only time will tell.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 6 4

Farmer (Rural Ohio)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I doubt we'll see much change round here; we're used to very little police presence.
  • If more incentives keep officers nearby, maybe things would change, but I ain't holding my breath.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Freelance Writer (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I often hear both positive and negative things about our police force.
  • Increased bonuses should hopefully lead to better officer attitudes and actions, but I hope the community dialogue stays open.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 6 3

Small Business Owner (Houston, TX)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • We had a break-in last year and there was little help from the police.
  • Any initiative that would improve their response or presence would be appreciated, as long as it doesn't reduce their quality.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 3
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 6 3

Retired Nurse (Miami, FL)

Age: 56 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Our neighborhood has kept quite safe through a cooperative relationship with law enforcement.
  • Additional financial measures might be good if they specifically enhance this spirit of collaboration.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 6

Barista (New York, NY)

Age: 24 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I have mixed feelings about more police incentives when there are many social issues unresolved.
  • If bonuses improve how they engage with communities, I could see some positivity.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 5 3
Year 20 4 3

Retired School Principal (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 62 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 9.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Bonuses could be a good thing if they help retain quality officers.
  • I just hope these changes mean more focus on preventing crime rather than just reacting.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 4

Logistics Manager (Memphis, TN)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I worry about my late-night commute through some parts of town.
  • If these bonuses keep officers actively engaged in improving safety, it could be a good step.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 6 3

College Student (Chicago, IL)

Age: 19 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Extra incentives might mean more officers care about community issues, which we need on campus.
  • A safer environment is crucial for our well-being as students.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 4

Social Worker (Seattle, WA)

Age: 47 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Retention bonuses could be positive for maintaining the progress we've made in community police relations.
  • I hope this funding is carefully deployed to avoid just inflating salaries without returns.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $200000000 (Low: $100000000, High: $300000000)

Year 2: $200000000 (Low: $100000000, High: $300000000)

Year 3: $200000000 (Low: $100000000, High: $300000000)

Year 5: $200000000 (Low: $100000000, High: $300000000)

Year 10: $200000000 (Low: $100000000, High: $300000000)

Year 100: $200000000 (Low: $100000000, High: $300000000)

Key Considerations