Bill Overview
Title: Building America’s Health Care Workforce Act
Description: This bill extends certain flexibilities relating to training and competency requirements for nurse aides in Medicare skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and Medicaid nursing facilities (NFs). Generally, SNFs and NFs may not hire nurse aides for longer than four months unless they meet certain training and certification requirements. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services waived some of these requirements during the COVID-19 emergency period so as to allow facilities to maintain adequate staffing levels; the waiver ends in June 2022. The bill extends these flexibilities for at least two years after the bill's enactment and specifies that (1) any time worked by a nurse aide during the emergency period counts toward the 75 hours required for initial training, and (2) a competency evaluation may be conducted at the SNF or NF where the nurse aide is employed if the state does not offer such an evaluation at least once a week.
Sponsors: Rep. Guthrie, Brett [R-KY-2]
Target Audience
Population: Nurse aides in SNFs and NFs around the world
Estimated Size: 300000
- The bill impacts nurse aides who are working or seeking to work in Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs) and Nursing Facilities (NFs) across the United States, as it involves their training and competency evaluations.
- The bill affects healthcare facilities that employ nurse aides by allowing more flexibility in hiring and maintaining their staff, thereby affecting facilities’ operations and staffing strategies.
- Families and patients who receive care in SNFs and NFs may be indirectly impacted due to potential changes in the workforce availability and competency due to this bill.
- The original waiver by the CMS was applicable during the COVID-19 pandemic and was meant to ensure adequate staffing levels; this bill seeks to extend some of that flexibility.
- It is not directly stated, but the bill might implicitly impact state regulatory bodies and workforce certification processes as it alters requirements for training and competency evaluation.
Reasoning
- Given the budget constraints, the policy likely prioritizes areas with a higher need for workforce support, particularly in SNFs and NFs with chronic understaffing issues.
- The target population primarily includes nurse aides, who are the frontline workers in SNFs and NFs. The policy helps by reducing barriers to long-term employment and ensuring these individuals can continue working in their roles without disruption.
- Facility administrators could benefit from this policy as it provides them with more flexibility in maintaining their workforce, potentially reducing turnover rates and ensuring better patient care consistency.
- There could be indirect impacts on the families and patients due to improved staffing levels and continuity of care, which can improve their well-being.
- The policy could indirectly affect state regulatory bodies as they may need to adjust training protocols and evaluation processes to accommodate these changes.
Simulated Interviews
Nurse Aide (Chicago, IL)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 16/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I started this job out of necessity during the pandemic and have been able to stay due to the flexibility allowed.
- This bill will allow me to gain permanent certification while continuing to work, which removes a load of stress from my life.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Nursing Facility Administrator (Rural Tennessee)
Age: 55 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 4
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Retaining qualified nurse aides has been a major challenge, particularly after the waiver period.
- This policy could allow me to maintain adequate staffing which is essential for patient care at our facility.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 3 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Nurse Aide Trainee (Phoenix, AZ)
Age: 29 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Job security during this training process makes a huge difference to someone like me.
- I believe this policy would make the transition from trainee to a permanent position smoother.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Retired Veteran (Miami, FL)
Age: 67 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 11/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The staff turnover has been a real concern for us residents here.
- Having the same aides around makes a big difference in the comfort and care we receive.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
State Health Official (New York, NY)
Age: 42 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This extension could simplify a lot of our transitional processes, but we need to ensure competencies are still being met.
- It’s an opportunity for us to rethink training and certification to meet future needs.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Nurse Aide (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 34 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 14/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Certification holds have meant I couldn’t take on more hours or a full-time role, which affects my income.
- This policy would help turn my experience into valid certification and full-time work.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Healthcare Economist (Houston, TX)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This bill highlights the importance of quick recruiting during emergencies, but we must ensure it truly enhances service quality long-term.
- Spending and training flexibility are crucial, but there needs to be a focus on monitoring competency outcomes cut across states.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Nurse Aid Educator (Seattle, WA)
Age: 49 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy could diversify our training offerings and attract more nurse aide students longer term.
- We should incorporate on-site evaluations more frequently, which this policy supports.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Nursing Student (Minneapolis, MN)
Age: 26 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Knowing there are more avenues open to aid practice could influence my career decisions.
- It might help gain experience faster, given the extended timelines to certification while working.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Family Member of SNF Resident (Denver, CO)
Age: 39 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Quality and consistency in care are vital, and policy changes affecting nurse aides can indirectly change the nature of care received by residents.
- I worry whether the policy ensures continued competence in caregiving roles, but do appreciate the staffing flexibility.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $10000000 (Low: $7000000, High: $15000000)
Year 2: $9000000 (Low: $6000000, High: $14000000)
Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Key Considerations
- The main cost consideration is administrative in nature, concerning the certification and training processes of nurse aides which may have deferred costs.
- Savings are primarily in operational efficiencies and potentially reduced state-level oversight burdens.
- As this policy provides temporary flexibility, the long-term financial impacts are likely minor and indirect.