Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7726

Bill Overview

Title: Inter-American Development Bank General Capital Increase Act of 2022

Description: This bill directs the President to take actions to support a capital increase for the Inter-American Development Bank and authorizes the U.S. governor of the bank to vote in favor of increasing the bank's capital stock. The bill also requires the Department of the Treasury and U.S. representatives to the bank to support efforts to help countries restructure debts resulting from loans by China's government.

Sponsors: Del. Plaskett, Stacey E. [D-VI-At Large]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals in Latin America and the Caribbean

Estimated Size: 64000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Banking Executive (Miami, FL)

Age: 46 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could stabilize some of the projects my bank is involved in, positively impacting our clients.
  • Increased capital might offer more opportunities for investment in regional developments I care about.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Small Business Owner (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 35 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This could improve the economic conditions in Latin America, which might boost my business through stronger regional economies.
  • I hope some of these funds go toward infrastructure improvements.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 6

International Policy Analyst (New York, NY)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy is positive for development and will potentially address debt issues that hold back progress.
  • This could mean more projects and partnerships for my NGO.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 10 7

Oil Industry Professional (Houston, TX)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm hopeful this will lead to more stable business environments in Latin America.
  • If the policy addresses debt issues effectively, it may reduce some risks we face in the market.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

University Student (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 22 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy aligns with what I study and definitely adds optimism for economic progress.
  • It resonates with my career ambitions in international development.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Retired Public School Teacher (Chicago, IL)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm not directly impacted by this policy, but I hope it brings stability to those regions.
  • It's good to see the U.S. involved in fostering international development.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Tech Entrepreneur (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 42 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This capital increase will likely create more opportunities for our business expansion in Latin America.
  • More stable economies mean better infrastructure for tech growth.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 6

Healthcare Worker (El Paso, TX)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Anything that helps our neighboring countries benefits us eventually.
  • This could bring job opportunities and economic benefits to border communities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Construction Manager (Denver, CO)

Age: 49 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don't see this policy affecting me directly, but understanding the global economy's interconnectedness, it may have subtle impacts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Software Developer (Seattle, WA)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm optimistic that this policy will improve IT infrastructure, which could enhance our operations.
  • Continued economic support could lead to more digital projects in those regions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $500000000 (Low: $300000000, High: $700000000)

Year 2: $500000000 (Low: $300000000, High: $700000000)

Year 3: $500000000 (Low: $300000000, High: $700000000)

Year 5: $500000000 (Low: $300000000, High: $700000000)

Year 10: $500000000 (Low: $300000000, High: $700000000)

Year 100: $500000000 (Low: $300000000, High: $700000000)

Key Considerations