Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7714

Bill Overview

Title: OUR Public Buildings Act

Description: This bill establishes requirements for outleasing certain federal buildings. Specifically, the General Services Administration (GSA) must develop and require the use of standard clauses to use in any outlease agreement that is for a public building that is at least 150,000 gross square feet; is entered into by the GSA and a private entity; for which the leased space totals at least 51% of the usable square feet of the building; and for which the term of the lease, including options, is in excess of five years. Any such agreement must require the lessee to submit a form disclosing any foreign ownership interest in the outlease. The GSA may not enter into such an outlease with the President, the Vice President, the head of an executive agency, or a Member of Congress. The outlease shall not take effect if Congress enacts a joint resolution of disapproval of the outlease and such joint resolution is signed by the President.

Sponsors: Rep. Titus, Dina [D-NV-1]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals involved with large federal building leases

Estimated Size: 300000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Building Manager (Washington D.C.)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I work closely with the GSA and see these changes as necessary for transparency.
  • The new standard clauses should streamline future lease negotiations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Corporate Real Estate Lawyer (New York, NY)

Age: 52 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could complicate lease negotiations with foreign-invested entities.
  • There may be a slight increase in legal work due to the new requirements.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Foreign Business Executive (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 38 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The disclosure requirement is concerning; it adds complexity to our plans.
  • We might reconsider our expansion within federal sites.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 6
Year 10 6 7
Year 20 6 7

GSA Employee (Denver, CO)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy will require adjustments in our administration, but it's manageable.
  • It's a step towards ensuring transparency and fair practices.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

CEO, Large Construction Firm (Chicago, IL)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The changes might cause delays in lease renewals.
  • Overall, our operations would adapt to meet these requirements.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 7

Non-Profit Director (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 33 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I worry about potential rent increases or changes to our lease terms due to the new clauses.
  • Our operations depend on stable leasing agreements.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Government Policy Analyst (Austin, TX)

Age: 41 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy introduction seems logical, promoting better lease arrangements.
  • Monitoring the disclosure requirements will be vital.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Real Estate Investor (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy might deter some foreign investors, which is concerning.
  • I expect additional due diligence requirements for new leases.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Entrepreneur (Miami, FL)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's important to have clear guidelines; the new policy provides that.
  • I welcome the transparency, but it could delay negotiations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Federal Building Maintenance Supervisor (Seattle, WA)

Age: 46 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy could improve coordination with lessees, ensuring better compliance.
  • I'm hopeful it will lead to fewer disputes over lease terms.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 9 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $10000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $15000000)

Year 2: $8000000 (Low: $6000000, High: $12000000)

Year 3: $8000000 (Low: $6000000, High: $12000000)

Year 5: $8000000 (Low: $6000000, High: $12000000)

Year 10: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $10000000)

Year 100: $3000000 (Low: $2000000, High: $7000000)

Key Considerations