Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7702

Bill Overview

Title: Ensuring Lasting Smiles Act

Description: This bill requires private health insurance plans to cover the diagnosis and treatment of craniofacial, oral, or maxillofacial congenital anomalies and birth defects. Coverage must include services and items that functionally improve, repair, or restore any body part that is medically necessary for normal bodily functions or appearance, as determined by the treating physician. Coverage limits and cost-sharing requirements for such services and items may not be more restrictive than those applicable to all medical and surgical benefits under the plan.

Sponsors: Rep. Dunn, Neal P. [R-FL-2]

Target Audience

Population: People with craniofacial, oral, or maxillofacial anomalies

Estimated Size: 1200000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Student (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 8 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 12.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm glad this policy is coming into place. It's been challenging dealing with partial coverage and not knowing if the next procedure will be covered.
  • My parents often worry about medical bills more than they should.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 5

Software Engineer (New York, NY)

Age: 32 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I might benefit from the policy, but I already have good coverage from my employer.
  • It's excellent for those who need it more.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Retail Manager (Chicago, IL)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could significantly reduce our financial burden.
  • It will allow us to seek better healthcare options and improve our child's quality of life.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 9 5
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 4

Artist (Houston, TX)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I support the policy, as my nephew was born with a cleft palate.
  • Anything that helps families deal with these conditions is welcome.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 7 7

Retired (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy would have helped my family immensely when I was growing up.
  • It's a step towards more equitable healthcare access.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Construction Worker (Miami, FL)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Insurance has always treated my condition as cosmetic rather than functional, making coverage difficult to obtain.
  • This policy could finally change that.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

College Student (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 22 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As a student, handling health insurance is daunting, especially for complex conditions. This policy can alleviate a lot of stress.
  • It should have been passed sooner.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

High School Student (Dallas, TX)

Age: 16 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm really hopeful that this means I can get the surgeries I need without my parents stressing about money.
  • It sounds like it could help us massively.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 3

Self-Employed (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 46 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 20/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This is going to be a game-changer for a lot of families.
  • We need more policies that address major health disparities like this.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Retired Medical Professional (Seattle, WA)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 17/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I have seen firsthand how impactful such coverage could be.
  • This will greatly improve accessibility to necessary procedures.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 9 9
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 8 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $1000000000 (Low: $800000000, High: $1200000000)

Year 2: $1020000000 (Low: $816000000, High: $1224000000)

Year 3: $1040400000 (Low: $832320000, High: $1248480000)

Year 5: $1082432160 (Low: $865945728, High: $1298916992)

Year 10: $1181495225 (Low: $945196180, High: $1423794270)

Year 100: $2853858691 (Low: $2283086953, High: $3424629429)

Key Considerations