Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7685

Bill Overview

Title: Truth in Small Business Contracting Credit Act of 2022

Description: This bill permits a federal agency to credit a single prime contract no more than two times for the purpose of meeting the annual governmentwide goals for procurement contracts awarded to small businesses.

Sponsors: Rep. Meuser, Daniel [R-PA-9]

Target Audience

Population: Small business contractors

Estimated Size: 1000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Small Business Owner (Austin, TX)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm worried about the new restrictions on contract crediting, as it may limit our ability to meet procurement goals.
  • We often team up for large contracts, and multiple credits were beneficial.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 6 7
Year 3 6 7
Year 5 5 7
Year 10 5 7
Year 20 5 7

Federal Procurement Officer (Washington, D.C.)

Age: 30 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy adds an extra layer of complexity to my job, but I understand the need for clearer crediting.
  • We will need more guidance on how this impacts our procurement statistics.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 5 6
Year 3 5 6
Year 5 5 6
Year 10 5 6
Year 20 5 6

Small Business Consultant (San Diego, CA)

Age: 41 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Many of my clients rely on understanding federal policies, and this change means more work for both me and them.
  • It could discourage smaller entities from competing due to complexity.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 8
Year 2 6 8
Year 3 6 8
Year 5 5 8
Year 10 5 8
Year 20 5 8

IT Specialist (Seattle, WA)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy doesn't affect me as my work is not connected to government contracts.
  • It seems targeted and niche.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Small Business Owner (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If the policy reduces competition, it could actually benefit us by leveling the playing field.
  • On the downside, less credits could mean fewer opportunities overall.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Retired (Denver, CO)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Though I'm retired, I see how this could have made things a bit challenging back in my day.
  • It's important they keep it fair for new entrants.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Financial Analyst (Boston, MA)

Age: 37 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It may affect market dynamics slightly if fewer small businesses engage in federal contracts.
  • As an analyst, there's always interest in changes to federal procurement.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 6 7
Year 3 6 7
Year 5 6 7
Year 10 6 7
Year 20 6 7

Small Business Owner (Detroit, MI)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • We haven't entered the federal space yet due to complexity.
  • Hearing about policies like these makes it seem even more cumbersome.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 5 6
Year 3 5 6
Year 5 5 6
Year 10 5 6
Year 20 5 6

Lawyer (New York, NY)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This change will definitely mean more work, clarifying how credits are going to be used by businesses.
  • Complexity means more business for lawyers, but does it always benefit the client?

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 6 7
Year 3 6 7
Year 5 6 7
Year 10 6 7
Year 20 6 7

Government Employee (Raleigh, NC)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This kind of policy might sound beneficial in ensuring fair process. However, the practical benefits need to be properly communicated to be effective.
  • Most small businesses need clear benefits to justify federal engagement.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 6 7
Year 10 6 7
Year 20 6 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)

Year 2: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)

Year 3: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)

Year 5: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)

Year 10: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)

Year 100: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)

Key Considerations