Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7682

Bill Overview

Title: Ensuring an Accurate Postal Fleet Electrification Act

Description: This bill prohibits the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) from procuring any delivery vehicle under the contract it entered into in February 2021 with Oshkosh Defense until the USPS issues a revised final environmental impact statement.

Sponsors: Rep. Maloney, Carolyn B. [D-NY-12]

Target Audience

Population: US Postal Service employees and US residents relying on postal services

Estimated Size: 331000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Postal Worker (Detroit, MI)

Age: 34 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm supportive of the environmental aspects, but I worry about how this will affect my day-to-day work and job stability if the fleet changes are delayed.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Environmental Advocate (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe this policy is a step in the right direction for sustainability. Accurate environmental impact assessments are crucial for policies that truly benefit the planet.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Farmer (Rural Georgia)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As long as the deliveries aren't too disrupted, I'm okay with waiting if it's for better environmental practices. Climate change is real to me. Package delays would be frustrating though.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 5 5

Small Business Owner (Houston, TX)

Age: 56 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Any delay in the USPS fleet could mean delays in shipping for my business. That worries me financially, but I can appreciate the intention for environmental diligence.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 5
Year 2 4 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

College Student (New York City, NY)

Age: 22 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think it's great to ensure environmental impact is considered carefully in procurement decisions. It's part of living sustainably.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Electric Vehicle Manufacturer (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 47 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If this leads to more EV orders for the postal fleet, it could be a boon for my industry. However, delays could stall that opportunity.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 6 6

Retired (Nashville, TN)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I appreciate that the USPS is considering its environmental impact, even if it means some temporary delays.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 8
Year 2 7 8
Year 3 7 8
Year 5 7 8
Year 10 7 8
Year 20 7 8

Logistics Manager (Miami, FL)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As a logistics manager, delays are always a concern, but the environmental benefits might outweigh short-term setbacks—so I'm cautiously optimistic.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

USPS Admin (Chicago, IL)

Age: 61 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Ensuring accurate environmental statements is important, but working with delays and potential budget shifts can make planning stressful.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Policy Analyst (Denver, CO)

Age: 50 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This sort of policy is essential to ensuring environmental impact assessments are taken seriously and integrated into federal decisions, though we need to track economic impacts as well.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $50000000 (Low: $30000000, High: $70000000)

Year 2: $10000000 (Low: $5000000, High: $15000000)

Year 3: $5000000 (Low: $2000000, High: $8000000)

Year 5: $2000000 (Low: $1000000, High: $3000000)

Year 10: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $1500000)

Year 100: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $1500000)

Key Considerations