Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7675

Bill Overview

Title: To amend the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 to establish an Agricultural and Food System Supply Chain Resilience and Crisis Response Task Force, and for other purposes.

Description: This bill directs the Department of Agriculture (USDA) to establish within USDA an Agricultural and Food System Supply Chain Resilience and Crisis Response Task Force. Among other responsibilities, the task force must (1) help promote the leadership of the United States with respect to the stability of the agriculture and food system supply chain; (2) monitor the resilience, diversity, security, and strength of the supply chain; and (3) support the creation of jobs with competitive wages in the U.S. agricultural and food system sector. The head of the task force must be the Special Advisor on Supply Chain Resilience and Crisis Response who must conduct an evaluation of the stability and reliability of the agriculture and food system supply chain and report to Congress on the evaluation.

Sponsors: Rep. Craig, Angie [D-MN-2]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals worldwide reliant on global agricultural supply chains

Estimated Size: 234000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Corn Farmer (Iowa)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think it's high time we focus on the resilience of our supply chains. We've seen too many disruptions in recent years.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 4

Supply Chain Analyst (New York)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This is great news! More focus on supply chain resilience will definitely open up more pathways in my career.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 8

Logistics Company Owner (California)

Age: 63 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Hopefully, this brings more stability in terms of contracts and pricing. Less stress as I think about retirement.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 4

Senior Manager at a Food Processing Plant (Florida)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • We've been struggling with delays and issues in the supply chain. Any improvement would be welcome.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 3
Year 5 7 3
Year 10 8 3
Year 20 7 3

New College Graduate (Kansas)

Age: 22 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It sounds like this could mean more job opportunities for people like me out of college. I'm hopeful.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Veterinarian (Texas)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Improving the supply chain means better access to resources for farms, which helps everyone in the chain.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Food Market Owner (North Carolina)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If this helps stabilize supply, it would be a blessing for small business owners like me.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 7 3
Year 20 6 3

Agri-tech Startup Founder (Illinois)

Age: 28 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could stimulate more interest and investment in agri-tech, which would be huge for us!

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Agricultural Policy Researcher (Washington State)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm interested to see how this Task Force will address sustainability while focusing on resilience.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Truck Driver (Michigan)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Anything that makes ordering and delivery more reliable is good for business and for peace of mind when planning routes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $30000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $40000000)

Year 2: $30000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $40000000)

Year 3: $30000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $40000000)

Year 5: $31000000 (Low: $22000000, High: $42000000)

Year 10: $32000000 (Low: $23000000, High: $43000000)

Year 100: $50000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $60000000)

Key Considerations