Bill Overview
Title: Manufactured Housing Affordability and Energy Efficiency Act of 2022
Description: This bill provides that certain requirements must be met in order for energy conservation standards for manufactured housing (promulgated by the Department of Energy) to become effective.
Sponsors: Rep. Kustoff, David [R-TN-8]
Target Audience
Population: People living in manufactured housing
Estimated Size: 22000000
- The bill focuses on energy conservation standards for manufactured housing, a common affordable housing option.
- Millions of people around the world, primarily in wealthier nations with significant housing shortages, live in manufactured homes.
- Many potential beneficiaries may face high energy costs due to less efficient housing.
Reasoning
- The policy targets the energy efficiency of manufactured homes where lower-income populations predominantly reside.
- Given the policy's budget, not all of the 22 million individuals will directly benefit initially; select groups in need may receive aid based on specific criteria such as energy inefficiency levels or income thresholds.
- The commonality of individuals may be varied, but emphasis is placed on capturing those possibly unaffected initially due to their housing situation (e.g., newer manufactured homes with pre-existing good standards).
Simulated Interviews
Retail Manager (Georgia)
Age: 35 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy sounds good if it helps lower my energy bills.
- I worry about potential rent increases if my landlord upgrades to meet the standards.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 4 |
Delivery Driver (Alabama)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 4
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Energy costs are hitting us hard.
- This could help us save money in the long run, but changing anything in the home worries me about costs.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 3 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 3 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 2 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 2 |
Retired (Florida)
Age: 67 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I hope my savings are enough, but any change on the energy front would be a relief.
- I'm not sure how much this will benefit me since my home is newer.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 4 | 3 |
Factory Worker (Texas)
Age: 29 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 14/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Any reduction in bills would be helpful, but landlord needs to comply.
- I hope this pushes for greener living which is crucial for our future.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 3 |
Construction Worker (California)
Age: 55 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 8.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- If it can help my kids have a better living environment, I'd support it.
- Cost of upgrades seems daunting. Regulations often increase living costs.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Teacher (New York)
Age: 50 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 11/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm less impacted directly, but my community is full of vulnerable people who could benefit greatly.
- I worry about how such funds are allocated and managed.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Nurse (Michigan)
Age: 42 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 6.0 years
Commonness: 13/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Energy efficiency is important, but it's just one of many financial pressures.
- If this policy translates to less financial strain, it would be greatly welcome.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 4 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 3 |
Small Business Owner (Oklahoma)
Age: 37 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 4.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- My family could benefit if the landlord complies.
- Fuel and energy are a huge part of operational costs, any help matters.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 4 | 3 |
Retired (Louisiana)
Age: 60 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 1.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I've seen bills reduce since upgrades, so I advocate for broader rollout.
- Wary of overregulation and associated red tape almost often negating benefits.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Teacher's Assistant (Mississippi)
Age: 24 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 4
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 16/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Every dollar counts and reduced energy bills would mean more savings.
- I'm concerned about landlords raising rent after upgrades, though.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 3 |
| Year 20 | 4 | 2 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $50000000 (Low: $30000000, High: $70000000)
Year 2: $55000000 (Low: $35000000, High: $75000000)
Year 3: $60000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $80000000)
Year 5: $65000000 (Low: $45000000, High: $85000000)
Year 10: $75000000 (Low: $55000000, High: $95000000)
Year 100: $85000000 (Low: $65000000, High: $105000000)
Key Considerations
- The impact on lower-income populations due to potential increased upfront costs for energy-efficient manufactured homes.
- Short and long-term savings associated with reduced energy consumption for residents of these homes.
- The potential reduction in energy demand and its effects on national energy policy.