Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7630

Bill Overview

Title: Childhood Cancer STAR Reauthorization Act of 2022

Description: This bill reauthorizes through FY2028 and modifies pediatric cancer research and related programs, including to expand collection of and access to relevant biospecimens and to support the transition of pediatric cancer survivors to primary care.

Sponsors: Rep. McCaul, Michael T. [R-TX-10]

Target Audience

Population: Pediatric cancer patients and survivors

Estimated Size: 500000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Pediatric Oncologist (New York, NY)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The reauthorization is crucial for ongoing research and helping survivors transition to normal healthcare.
  • It can fill gaps in resources though may not be sufficient for all needs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Student (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 11 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm too young to fully understand everything, but my mom said it will help us get new medicine and doctors.
  • I just want to feel better and play with my friends.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Medical Research Scientist (Houston, TX)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The expansion of biospecimen collection is a game-changer for targeted therapies.
  • We need consistent funding to translate research into effective treatments.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Child Life Specialist (Chicago, IL)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Access to primary care post-treatment is vital for comprehensive recovery.
  • This bill helps us provide extended support.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Healthcare Policy Analyst (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While the investment is substantial, the reach may be limited within the broader healthcare budget.
  • It's a positive step but needs more engagement with local initiatives.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Student (Detroit, MI)

Age: 9 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 12.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's good they'll have more doctors for us.
  • Hope they'll make medicines to keep cancer away forever.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 9 8

Mother and Caregiver (Seattle, WA)

Age: 33 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy is a much-needed support for caregivers like us.
  • Transitioning to primary care is a nightmare; hope this makes it easier.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Retired Pediatrician (Miami, FL)

Age: 65 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I've seen firsthand the resources needed in pediatric oncology.
  • Reauthorization ensures continuity in research and care transitions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

High School Student (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 15 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having more resources is awesome, especially for mental health.
  • I just want doctors who understand and help me transition smoothly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Cancer Research Fundraiser (Boston, MA)

Age: 72 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The reauthorization means we can push harder for lasting research projects.
  • It's all about keeping the momentum in this fight.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $150000000 (Low: $130000000, High: $170000000)

Year 2: $150000000 (Low: $130000000, High: $170000000)

Year 3: $150000000 (Low: $130000000, High: $170000000)

Year 5: $150000000 (Low: $130000000, High: $170000000)

Year 10: $150000000 (Low: $130000000, High: $170000000)

Year 100: $150000000 (Low: $130000000, High: $170000000)

Key Considerations