Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7627

Bill Overview

Title: Advancing Equity Through the Arts and Humanities Act of 2022

Description: This bill establishes an Advancing Equity Through the Arts and Humanities Program to increase engagement with public and nonprofit entities (including faith-based and community-based organizations that serve and are led by people of color) in supporting arts and humanities projects that directly combat systemic racism through the arts and humanities. The National Endowment for the Arts and the National Endowment for the Humanities shall carry out this program. The bill also provides for a competitive grant program for the creation and expansion of programs to support public and nonprofit arts and humanities organizations that directly combat systemic racism through the arts and humanities.

Sponsors: Rep. Lee, Barbara [D-CA-13]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals worldwide involved in or impacted by arts and humanities projects combating systemic racism

Estimated Size: 150000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Museum Curator (New York, NY)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could bring much-needed funding to expand our museum's outreach and community engagement programs.
  • By supporting efforts to address systemic racism, we can facilitate more inclusive and diverse exhibitions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 5

Film Producer (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • We struggle to fund documentary projects that voice minority issues. This policy could be a total game changer by providing resources.
  • Having the ability to tell more stories could influence public perception and understanding of racial issues.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Community Arts Organizer (Chicago, IL)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This initiative can make a real difference in establishing consistent support for indigenous arts.
  • It’ll be great to finally see Native voices uplifted consistently in arts programs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 5

Art Teacher (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 52 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 12.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • With this support, I could expand my after-school programs to reach more kids of color.
  • Arts have a powerful role in education, and this could help bridge some gaps in learning disparities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 5

Musician (Houston, TX)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Grants from this policy can help artists like me to continue producing impactful music.
  • It’s a step toward ensuring our voices are heard and our work reaches broader audiences.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Community Leader (Mobile, AL)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having funding available could significantly help in preserving and promoting African American history here.
  • This funding can strengthen the community's sense of identity and place.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 8 3

Digital Artist (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 27 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This bill will offer new opportunities to digital artists exploring themes of racial justice.
  • It’s great to see the arts being recognized as a vehicle for social change.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Storyteller (Santa Fe, NM)

Age: 62 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Stories are an important part of our culture, and this funding could help preserve our traditions.
  • I hope this policy recognizes the value of traditional storytelling and its role in systemic racism.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Writer (Seattle, WA)

Age: 44 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It’s crucial for the arts to tackle systemic issues, but I wonder how the policy will balance funding among different artistic expressions.
  • This could allow for more collaborations and reaching audiences that wouldn’t engage otherwise.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Gallery Owner (Detroit, MI)

Age: 48 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy will strengthen not only our gallery but the local talent it promotes by allowing us to expand exhibitions.
  • It’s a rare chance to put Black artists front and center.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 8 3
Year 20 7 3

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $30000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $40000000)

Year 2: $31000000 (Low: $21000000, High: $42000000)

Year 3: $32000000 (Low: $22000000, High: $43000000)

Year 5: $34000000 (Low: $23000000, High: $45000000)

Year 10: $36000000 (Low: $25000000, High: $47000000)

Year 100: $50000000 (Low: $30000000, High: $70000000)

Key Considerations